These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22447477)

  • 21. Association of an Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Quality Improvement Program With Terminal Digit Preference and Recorded Mean Blood Pressure in 11 Clinics.
    Kottke TE; Anderson JP; Zillhardt JD; Sperl-Hillen JM; O'Connor PJ; Green BB; Williams RA; Averbeck BM; Stiffman MN; Beran M; Rakotz M; Margolis KL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Aug; 5(8):e2229098. PubMed ID: 36044216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of semi-automatic device UA-704 for self-measurement of blood pressure.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Rodionov E
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 16077269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Parker D; Liu K; Dyer AR; Giumetti D; Liao YL; Stamler J
    Hypertension; 1988 Mar; 11(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 3280484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Yang W; Gu D; Chen J; Jaquish CE; Rao DC; Wu X; Hixson JE; Duan X; Kelly TN; Hamm LL; Whelton PK; He J;
    Am J Med Sci; 2008 Nov; 336(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 19011391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension.
    Roubsanthisuk W; Wongsurin U; Saravich S; Buranakitjaroen P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 17353647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Replacing manual sphygmomanometers with automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice.
    Myers MG
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2014 Jan; 41(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 23819734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Blood pressure measurements by the Keito machine. Evaluation versus office blood pressure by physicians.
    Staal EM; Nygård OK; Omvik P; Gerdts E
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Jun; 9(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 15199310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
    Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Terminal digit bias is not an issue for properly trained healthcare personnel using manual or semi-automated devices - biomed 2010.
    Butler KR; Minor DS; Benghuzzi HA; Tucci M
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2010; 46():75-80. PubMed ID: 20467075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simultaneous blood pressure measurement in both arms in hypertensive and nonhypertensive adult patients.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM; García de Alba-García JE
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 22781632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
    Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.
    de Lusignan S; Belsey J; Hague N; Dzregah B
    J Hum Hypertens; 2004 Apr; 18(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 15037875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Random-zero sphygmomanometer, Rose's tape, and the accuracy of the blood pressure measurements in children.
    Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Uhari M
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Aug; 32(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 1508618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality control of the blood pressure phenotype in the Gaoyou population study.
    Lu YC; Li SS; Zhang HF; Odili AN; Yao WM; Gong L; Zhou YL; Zhou F; Yang R; Sheng YH; Xu DJ; Kong XQ; Staessen JA; Li XL
    Blood Press; 2016 Jun; 25(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 26581308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Loaned self-measurement equipment model compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
    César CV; Victoria PR; Rogelio TS
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Apr; 8(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 12819557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ESCAPE-ancillary blood pressure measurement study: end-digit preference in blood pressure measurement within a cluster-randomized trial.
    Lebeau JP; Pouchain D; Huas D; Wilmart F; Dibao-Dina C; Boutitie F
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Apr; 16(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 21358538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.