BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22448735)

  • 1. Development of a rule-based method for the assessment of protein druggability.
    Perola E; Herman L; Weiss J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):1027-38. PubMed ID: 22448735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling.
    Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structure-based druggability assessment--identifying suitable targets for small molecule therapeutics.
    Fauman EB; Rai BK; Huang ES
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 21704549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ligand aligning method for molecular docking: alignment of property-weighted vectors.
    Joung JY; Nam KY; Cho KH; No KT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):984-95. PubMed ID: 22471323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drug-like density: a method of quantifying the "bindability" of a protein target based on a very large set of pockets and drug-like ligands from the Protein Data Bank.
    Sheridan RP; Maiorov VN; Holloway MK; Cornell WD; Gao YD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2029-40. PubMed ID: 20977231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular fields in ligand discovery.
    Gane PJ; Chan AW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():479-99. PubMed ID: 23729264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structure-based and multiple potential three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (SB-MP-3D-QSAR) for inhibitor design.
    Du QS; Gao J; Wei YT; Du LQ; Wang SQ; Huang RB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):996-1004. PubMed ID: 22480344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thermodynamics of fragment binding.
    Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22458364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure-based virtual screening for novel ligands.
    Pitt WR; Calmiano MD; Kroeplien B; Taylor RD; Turner JP; King MA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():501-19. PubMed ID: 23729265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
    Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NMR in structure-based drug design.
    Carneiro MG; Ab E; Theisgen S; Siegal G
    Essays Biochem; 2017 Nov; 61(5):485-493. PubMed ID: 29118095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery.
    Pérot S; Sperandio O; Miteva MA; Camproux AC; Villoutreix BO
    Drug Discov Today; 2010 Aug; 15(15-16):656-67. PubMed ID: 20685398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational method to identify druggable binding sites that target protein-protein interactions.
    Li H; Kasam V; Tautermann CS; Seeliger D; Vaidehi N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding and predicting druggability. A high-throughput method for detection of drug binding sites.
    Schmidtke P; Barril X
    J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5858-67. PubMed ID: 20684613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure-based target druggability assessment.
    Trosset JY; Vodovar N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 986():141-64. PubMed ID: 23436411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ligand specificity, privileged substructures and protein druggability from fragment-based screening.
    Barelier S; Krimm I
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 21411360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining global and local measures for structure-based druggability predictions.
    Volkamer A; Kuhn D; Grombacher T; Rippmann F; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):360-72. PubMed ID: 22148551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SGC beyond structural genomics: redefining the role of 3D structures by coupling genomic stratification with fragment-based discovery.
    Bradley AR; Echalier A; Fairhead M; Strain-Damerell C; Brennan P; Bullock AN; Burgess-Brown NA; Carpenter EP; Gileadi O; Marsden BD; Lee WH; Yue W; Bountra C; von Delft F
    Essays Biochem; 2017 Nov; 61(5):495-503. PubMed ID: 29118096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.