These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22448984)

  • 1. Developmental trajectories of part-based and configural object recognition in adolescence.
    Jüttner M; Wakui E; Petters D; Kaur S; Davidoff J
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Jan; 49(1):161-76. PubMed ID: 22448984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Late development of metric part-relational processing in object recognition.
    Jüttner M; Petters D; Wakui E; Davidoff J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1718-34. PubMed ID: 24979361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A developmental dissociation of view-dependent and view-invariant object recognition in adolescence.
    Jüttner M; Müller A; Rentschler I
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 175(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 17055074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of animal recognition: a difference between Parts and Wholes.
    Davidoff J; Roberson D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Mar; 81(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 11884088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acquired prosopagnosia as a face-specific disorder: ruling out the general visual similarity account.
    Busigny T; Graf M; Mayer E; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2051-67. PubMed ID: 20362595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four-to-six-year-old children use norm-based coding in face-space.
    Jeffery L; McKone E; Haynes R; Firth E; Pellicano E; Rhodes G
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):18. PubMed ID: 20616134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artifacts and natural kinds: children's judgments about whether objects are owned.
    Neary KR; Van de Vondervoort JW; Friedman O
    Dev Psychol; 2012 Jan; 48(1):149-58. PubMed ID: 21928884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Configuration perception and face memory, and face context effects in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Huis in 't Veld E; Van den Stock J; de Gelder B
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):464-81. PubMed ID: 23190402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative case study of face recognition: the contribution of configural and part-based recognition systems, and their interaction.
    Rivest J; Moscovitch M; Black S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2798-811. PubMed ID: 19524599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impaired configural body processing in anorexia nervosa: evidence from the body inversion effect.
    Urgesi C; Fornasari L; Canalaz F; Perini L; Cremaschi S; Faleschini L; Thyrion EZ; Zuliani M; Balestrieri M; Fabbro F; Brambilla P
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Nov; 105(4):486-508. PubMed ID: 24206365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents.
    Uttal DH; Gentner D; Liu LL; Lewis AR
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):156-70. PubMed ID: 18171376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity dependency of the change in ERP component N1 accompanying with the object recognition learning.
    Tokudome W; Wang G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 22115890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociating positive and negative influences of verbal processing on the recognition of pictures of faces and objects.
    Nakabayashi K; Burton AM; Brandimonte MA; Lloyd-Jones TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):376-90. PubMed ID: 21988409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of perceptual sensitivity to second-order facial relations in children.
    Baudouin JY; Gallay M; Durand K; Robichon F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Nov; 107(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 20598706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative priming of unattended part primes: implications for models of holistic and analytic processing in object recognition.
    Conlan LI; Phillips JC; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2289-97. PubMed ID: 19626574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.