319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22449360)
1. Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.
Heeren W; Coene M; Vaerenberg B; Avram A; Cardinaletti A; del Bo L; Pascu A; Volpato F; Govaerts PJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Nov; 13(4):206-19. PubMed ID: 22449360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds.
Bent T; Bradlow AR; Wright BA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 16478329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of language experience and expectations on attention to consonants and tones in English and Mandarin Chinese.
Lin M; Francis AL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2827-38. PubMed ID: 25373982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B; Peeters H; Keenan D
Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):779-95. PubMed ID: 20622673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
Atagi E; Bent T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Categorical perception of intonation contrasts: effects of listeners' language background.
Liu C; Rodriguez A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):EL427-33. PubMed ID: 22713017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants.
Kalathottukaren RT; Purdy SC; Ballard E
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):444-52. PubMed ID: 25634773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical assessment of pitch perception.
Vaerenberg B; Pascu A; Del Bo L; Schauwers K; De Ceulaer G; Daemers K; Coene M; Govaerts PJ
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):736-41. PubMed ID: 21646931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.
Bhatara A; Boll-Avetisyan N; Unger A; Nazzi T; Höhle B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3828-43. PubMed ID: 24180792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonnative English speaker performance on the Basic English Lexicon (BEL) sentences.
Rimikis S; Smiljanic R; Calandruccio L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):792-804. PubMed ID: 23275396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].
Meister H; Tepeli D; Wagner P; Hess W; Walger M; von Wedel H; Lang-Roth R
HNO; 2007 Apr; 55(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 17004071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On Older Listeners' Ability to Perceive Dynamic Pitch.
Shen J; Wright R; Souza PE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 27177161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of stimulus duration and vowel quality in cross-linguistic categorical perception of pitch directions.
Chen S; Zhu Y; Wayland R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180656. PubMed ID: 28671991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phonological processing in Mandarin speakers with congenital amusia.
Wang X; Peng G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3360. PubMed ID: 25480080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of listeners' and talkers' linguistic backgrounds on W-22 test performance.
Cakiroglu S; Danhauer JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 May; 3(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 1581593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Conception and realisation of a prosody test battery].
Meister H; Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Wagner P; Walger M; von Wedel H
HNO; 2008 Mar; 56(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 17579822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
