These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22451374)

  • 1. A test of Rescorla and Wagner's (1972) prediction of nonlinear effects in contingency learning.
    Morís J; Carnero S; Loy I
    Learn Behav; 2012 Dec; 40(4):507-19. PubMed ID: 22451374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pavlovian conditioning under partial reinforcement: The effects of nonreinforced trials versus cumulative conditioned stimulus duration.
    Harris JA; Bouton ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):256-272. PubMed ID: 32162948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can the stimulus processing assumptions of the sometimes-opponent-process (SOP) model explain instances of contextual learning?
    Vogel EH; Ponce FP; Brandon SE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):205-214. PubMed ID: 32730079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning.
    Murphy RA; Baker AG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jul; 30(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 15279513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, intertrial interval, and I/T ratio on appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.
    Thrailkill EA; Todd TP; Bouton ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):243-255. PubMed ID: 32175762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.
    Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].
    Rasmussen A; Zucca R; Johansson F; Jirenhed DA; Hesslow G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Nov; 112(45):14060-5. PubMed ID: 26504227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An application of Wagner's Standard Operating Procedures or Sometimes Opponent Processes (SOP) model to experimental extinction.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):215-234. PubMed ID: 32730080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pavlovian contingencies and temporal information.
    Balsam PD; Fairhurst S; Gallistel CR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):284-94. PubMed ID: 16834495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus generalization: some predictions from a model of Pavlovian conditioning.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1976 Jan; 2(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 1249526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of an ambiguous-feature discrimination.
    Haselgrove M; Robinson J; Nelson A; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1710-25. PubMed ID: 18942036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory priming and trial spacing effects in Pavlovian learning.
    Sunsay C; Stetson L; Bouton ME
    Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15281394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of responding to A after A+/AX+ training: challenges for a comparator theory of learning.
    Esber GR; Pearce JM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):485-97. PubMed ID: 19839701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials.
    Gunther LM; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 10881603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioned inhibition and reinforcement rate.
    Harris JA; Kwok DW; Andrew BJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(3):335-54. PubMed ID: 25545981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When the stimulus is predicted and what the stimulus predicts: Alternative accounts of habituation.
    Hall G; Rodríguez G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):327-340. PubMed ID: 32730085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overshadowing by fixed- and variable-duration stimuli.
    Bonardi C; Mondragón E; Brilot B; Jennings DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):523-42. PubMed ID: 25203812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serotonin 1B receptor effects on response inhibition are independent of inhibitory learning.
    Desrochers SS; Nautiyal KM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Jan; 187():107574. PubMed ID: 34902574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failure of retrospective revaluation to influence blocking.
    Dopson JC; Pearce JM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 19839700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some determinants of second-order conditioning.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2011 Mar; 39(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 21264564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.