These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22451565)

  • 1. Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products.
    Wiesinger B; Stütz A; Schmehl J; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr; 198(4):946-54. PubMed ID: 22451565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of visibility for four self-expanding nitinol bare stents in vitro.
    Wiesinger B; Stütz A; Schmehl J; Groezinger G; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):1020-5. PubMed ID: 22969090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiopacity of current endovascular stents: evaluation in a multiple reader phantom study.
    Wiskirchen J; Kraemer K; König C; Kramer U; Trübenbach J; Wersebe A; Tepe G; Dietz K; Claussen CD; Duda SH
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):843-52. PubMed ID: 15297588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difference in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector in peripheral angiography and the effect of BMI.
    Wiesinger B; Kirchner S; Blumenstock G; Herz K; Schmehl J; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J
    Rofo; 2013 Feb; 185(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23196837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Therapeutic angiographic procedures: differences in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector.
    Spira D; Kirchner S; Blumenstock G; Herz K; Ketelsen D; Wiskirchen J; Wiesinger B
    Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26231951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiopaque markers in endovascular stents--benefit and potential hazards.
    Wiskirchen J; Venugopalan R; Holton AD; König C; Kramer U; Trübenbach J; Tepe G; Claussen CD; Duda SH
    Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 12677502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.
    Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of an II based and a flat panel based cardiovascular fluoroscopy system within a clinical environment.
    Grewal RK; McLean ID
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 16250468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: optimization of the radiation dose to the patient using a flat-panel detector angiographic suite.
    Sapoval M; Pellerin O; Rehel JL; Houdoux N; Rahmoune G; Aubert B; Fitton I
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Oct; 33(5):949-54. PubMed ID: 20094719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
    Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial resolution limits of multislice computed tomography (MS-CT), C-arm-CT, and flat panel-CT (FP-CT) compared to MicroCT for visualization of a small metallic stent.
    Ionescu M; Metcalfe RW; Cody D; Alvarado MV; Hipp J; Benndorf G
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):866-75. PubMed ID: 21669352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [In vitro examination of the visibility of 11 stent catheters with real-time MR imaging].
    Zorger N; Pätzel C; Hamer OW; Lenhart M; Völk M; Herold T; Feuerbach S; Nitz WR
    Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1311-8. PubMed ID: 15346267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing peripherally-inserted central catheter procedure using conventional angiography equipment and flat panel detector-based mobile C-arm fluoroscopy.
    Lee T; Shin SW; Choi D; Cho SK; Hyun D; Do YS; Jeon S; Cha B; Bok EK; Kim S
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24292900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers.
    Létourneau-Guillon L; Soulez G; Beaudoin G; Oliva VL; Giroux MF; Qin Z; Boussion N; Therasse E; De Guise J; Cloutier G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Jun; 15(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 15178723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems.
    Suzuki S; Yamaguchi I; Kidouchi T; Yamamoto A; Masumoto T; Ozaki Y
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Apr; 34(2):376-82. PubMed ID: 20495804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the microangiographic fluoroscope (MAF) using generalized system performance metrics.
    Jain A; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031915. PubMed ID: 23464330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Performance characteristics of self-expanding peripheral nitinol stents].
    Wissgott C; Schmidt W; Behrens P; Schmitz KP; Andresen R
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 19353486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.