607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22452248)
1. Performance of isobaric and isotopic labeling in quantitative plant proteomics.
Nogueira FC; Palmisano G; Schwämmle V; Campos FA; Larsen MR; Domont GB; Roepstorff P
J Proteome Res; 2012 May; 11(5):3046-52. PubMed ID: 22452248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Isotope labeling-based quantitative proteomics of developing seeds of castor oil seed (Ricinus communis L.).
Nogueira FC; Palmisano G; Schwämmle V; Soares EL; Soares AA; Roepstorff P; Domont GB; Campos FA
J Proteome Res; 2013 Nov; 12(11):5012-24. PubMed ID: 24090105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isotope coded protein label quantification of serum proteins--comparison with the label-free LC-MS and validation using the MRM approach.
Turtoi A; Mazzucchelli GD; De Pauw E
Talanta; 2010 Feb; 80(4):1487-95. PubMed ID: 20082806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of cellular MMP substrates using quantitative proteomics: isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT) and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ).
Butler GS; Dean RA; Morrison CJ; Overall CM
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 622():451-70. PubMed ID: 20135298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ICPL labeling strategies for proteome research.
Lottspeich F; Kellermann J
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():55-64. PubMed ID: 21604115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of isotope-coded protein labeling (ICPL) in the quantitative analysis of complex proteomes.
Paradela A; Marcilla M; Navajas R; Ferreira L; Ramos-Fernandez A; Fernández M; Mariscotti JF; García-del Portillo F; Albar JP
Talanta; 2010 Feb; 80(4):1496-502. PubMed ID: 20082807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of different multidimensional LC-MS/MS pipelines for isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based proteomic analysis of potato tubers in response to cold storage.
Yang Y; Qiang X; Owsiany K; Zhang S; Thannhauser TW; Li L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Oct; 10(10):4647-60. PubMed ID: 21842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High precision quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ on an LTQ Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometric method combining the benefits of all.
Köcher T; Pichler P; Schutzbier M; Stingl C; Kaul A; Teucher N; Hasenfuss G; Penninger JM; Mechtler K
J Proteome Res; 2009 Oct; 8(10):4743-52. PubMed ID: 19663507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combinatorial use of offline SCX and online RP-RP liquid chromatography for iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics applications.
Lau E; Lam MP; Siu SO; Kong RP; Chan WL; Zhou Z; Huang J; Lo C; Chu IK
Mol Biosyst; 2011 May; 7(5):1399-408. PubMed ID: 21350782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos.
Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust workflow for iTRAQ-based peptide and protein quantification.
Beck F; Burkhart JM; Geiger J; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():101-13. PubMed ID: 22665297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential proteomic analysis using isotope-coded protein-labeling strategies: comparison, improvements and application to simulated microgravity effect on Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34.
Leroy B; Rosier C; Erculisse V; Leys N; Mergeay M; Wattiez R
Proteomics; 2010 Jun; 10(12):2281-91. PubMed ID: 20391527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Isobaric protein and peptide quantification: perspectives and issues.
Treumann A; Thiede B
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2010 Oct; 7(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 20973638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative proteome analysis using isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL).
Arntzen MO; Koehler CJ; Treumann A; Thiede B
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():65-76. PubMed ID: 21604116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ICPLQuant - A software for non-isobaric isotopic labeling proteomics.
Brunner A; Keidel EM; Dosch D; Kellermann J; Lottspeich F
Proteomics; 2010 Jan; 10(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 19953540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive comparison of iTRAQ and label-free LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches using two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains of interest for biofuels engineering.
Wang H; Alvarez S; Hicks LM
J Proteome Res; 2012 Jan; 11(1):487-501. PubMed ID: 22059437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gaining efficiency by parallel quantification and identification of iTRAQ-labeled peptides using HCD and decision tree guided CID/ETD on an LTQ Orbitrap.
Mischerikow N; van Nierop P; Li KW; Bernstein HG; Smit AB; Heck AJ; Altelaar AF
Analyst; 2010 Oct; 135(10):2643-52. PubMed ID: 20714520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research.
Wiese S; Reidegeld KA; Meyer HE; Warscheid B
Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 7(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17177251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents: requirements for absolute quantification of proteins and peptides.
Quaglia M; Pritchard C; Hall Z; O'Connor G
Anal Biochem; 2008 Aug; 379(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 18510936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of two isobaric labeling tags, DiART and iTRAQ.
Chen Z; Wang Q; Lin L; Tang Q; Edwards JL; Li S; Liu S
Anal Chem; 2012 Mar; 84(6):2908-15. PubMed ID: 22404494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
