These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22452555)

  • 21. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements.
    Juravle G; Deubel H; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):302-10. PubMed ID: 21872190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lateralized ERP components related to spatial orienting: discriminating the direction of attention from processing sensory aspects of the cue.
    Jongen EM; Smulders FT; Van der Heiden JS
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):968-86. PubMed ID: 17617171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrospective Selection in Visual and Tactile Working Memory Is Mediated by Shared Control Mechanisms.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 32(3):546-557. PubMed ID: 31659924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
    Eimer M; Driver J
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 11037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.
    Katus T; Müller MM; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1390-5. PubMed ID: 25632117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supramodal effects of covert spatial orienting triggered by visual or tactile events.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Apr; 14(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 11970799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cue-locked lateralized components in a tactile spatial attention task: Evidence for a functional dissociation between ADAN and LSN.
    Gherri E; Gooray E; Forster B
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 26695445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age-related loss in attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1502-13. PubMed ID: 22406692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Object-guided spatial attention in touch: holding the same object with both hands delays attentional selection.
    Gillmeister H; Adler J; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):931-42. PubMed ID: 19413480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 17485166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.
    Vogel EK; Woodman GF; Luck SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22. PubMed ID: 16356328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention.
    Spence C; McGlone FP
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 141(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 11715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.