179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22453874)
1. From fracture risk prediction to evaluating fracture patterns: recent advances in the epidemiology of osteoporosis.
Wright NC; Saag KG
Curr Rheumatol Rep; 2012 Jun; 14(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 22453874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool May Not Indicate Bone Fragility in Women With Type 2 Diabetes.
Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
Am J Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 360(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 32376002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women with diabetes: comparison between DeFRA and FRAX tools.
Bonaccorsi G; Messina C; Cervellati C; Maietti E; Medini M; Rossini M; Massari L; Greco P
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2018 May; 34(5):404-408. PubMed ID: 29172781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis and management of bone fragility in diabetes: an emerging challenge.
Ferrari SL; Abrahamsen B; Napoli N; Akesson K; Chandran M; Eastell R; El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Josse R; Kendler DL; Kraenzlin M; Suzuki A; Pierroz DD; Schwartz AV; Leslie WD;
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Dec; 29(12):2585-2596. PubMed ID: 30066131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX® prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study.
Iki M; Fujita Y; Tamaki J; Kouda K; Yura A; Sato Y; Moon JS; Winzenrieth R; Okamoto N; Kurumatani N
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1841-8. PubMed ID: 25752623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of previous falls in major osteoporotic fracture prediction in conjunction with FRAX in older Chinese men and women: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong.
Su Y; Leung J; Kwok T
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Feb; 29(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 29067485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores.
Cummins NM; Poku EK; Towler MR; O'Driscoll OM; Ralston SH
Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Aug; 89(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 21647704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteoporosis epidemiology 2013: implications for diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.
Leslie WD; Morin SN
Curr Opin Rheumatol; 2014 Jul; 26(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 24807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence and seasonal variation of hypovitaminosis D and its relationship to bone metabolism in healthy Hungarian men over 50 years of age: the HunMen Study.
Bhattoa HP; Nagy E; More C; Kappelmayer J; Balogh A; Kalina E; Antal-Szalmas P
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Jan; 24(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 22422303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of bone quality in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Jiang N; Xia W
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1721-1736. PubMed ID: 29736760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.
Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):391-7. PubMed ID: 21365460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of FRAX in clinical practice according to sex and osteoporosis definitions: the Manitoba BMD registry.
Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Johansson H; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Mar; 29(3):759-767. PubMed ID: 29404625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry.
Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2557-2564. PubMed ID: 28593449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anti-osteoporosis drug use: too little, too much, or just right? The HUNT study, Norway.
Hoff M; Skurtveit S; Meyer HE; Langhammer A; Søgaard AJ; Syversen U; Skovlund E; Abrahamsen B; Forsmo S; Schei B
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1875-1885. PubMed ID: 29774403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Iran.
Khashayar P; Keshtkar A; Ostovar A; Larijani B; Johansson H; Harvey NC; Lorentzon M; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2225-2230. PubMed ID: 31372709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Beaudoin C; Moore L; Gagné M; Bessette L; Ste-Marie LG; Brown JP; Jean S
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30877348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
