These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22453874)

  • 81. [Diagnosis and management of patients with diabetes and co-existing osteoporosis (Update 2023) : Common guideline of the Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the Austrian Diabetes Society].
    Muschitz C; Kautzky-Willer A; Winhofer Y; Rauner M; Haschka J; Cejka D; Wakolbinger-Habel R; Pietschmann P
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2023 Jan; 135(Suppl 1):207-224. PubMed ID: 37101043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Diabetes and Osteoporosis: Part II, Clinical Management.
    Schacter GI; Leslie WD
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 2021 Jun; 50(2):287-297. PubMed ID: 34023044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Low self-awareness of osteoporosis and fracture risk among postmenopausal women.
    Langer FW; da Silveira Codevilla AA; Bringhenti R; Dal Osto LC; Campos TR; Martins TT; Barin AE; Rigo PH; Boufleuer ND; Santinon SF; Kipper K; Rodrigues J; Premaor MO
    Arch Osteoporos; 2016 Dec; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 27503622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model.
    Zerbini CA; Szejnfeld VL; Abergaria BH; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Kanis JA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2015; 10():224. PubMed ID: 26303038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Development of a risk assessment tool for osteoporotic fracture prevention: A claims data approach.
    Reber KC; König HH; Becker C; Rapp K; Büchele G; Mächler S; Lindlbauer I
    Bone; 2018 May; 110():170-176. PubMed ID: 29421456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Volumetric femoral BMD, bone geometry, and serum sclerostin levels differ between type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women with and without fragility fractures.
    Heilmeier U; Carpenter DR; Patsch JM; Harnish R; Joseph GB; Burghardt AJ; Baum T; Schwartz AV; Lang TF; Link TM
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Apr; 26(4):1283-93. PubMed ID: 25582311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?
    Collins GS; Michaëlsson K
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2012 Sep; 10(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 22688862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Bone age is not just for kids.
    Cauley JA; Shoback DM
    Elife; 2021 Mar; 10():. PubMed ID: 33650970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. [Osteoporosis in diabetes mellitus patients].
    Jackuliak P; Kovářová M; Kužma M; Payer J
    Vnitr Lek; 2021; 67(5):291-295. PubMed ID: 35459395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Bone: Risk of osteoporotic fractures in irritable bowel syndrome.
    Compston JE
    Nat Rev Endocrinol; 2013 Jan; 9(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 23165162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Response to letter, re. "Comparison of fracture risk between type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive real-world data".
    Ha J; Baek KH
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Apr; 33(4):955-956. PubMed ID: 35175393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX: response to Bolland et al.
    Kanis JA; Oden A; Johansson H; McCloskey E
    Osteoporos Int; 2013 Jan; 24(1):391-2. PubMed ID: 22584995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Comment on Kanis et al.: Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Gamble G; Reid IR
    Osteoporos Int; 2013 Jan; 24(1):389-90. PubMed ID: 22584994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. High risk of osteoporotic fracture in Parkinson's disease: Meta-analysis, pathophysiology and management.
    Louvois M; Ferrero S; Barnetche T; Roux CH; Breuil V
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2021 Jun; 177(6):660-669. PubMed ID: 33019997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Short time horizons for fracture prediction tools: time for a rethink.
    McCloskey EV; Borgstrom F; Cooper C; Harvey NC; Javaid MK; Lorentzon M; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1019-1025. PubMed ID: 33914103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. A study to predict fracture risk using bone mineral density and FRAX score in patients on chronic maintenance haemodialysis.
    Patro SK; Pawar N; Biswas D
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2022 Jan; 11(1):170-175. PubMed ID: 35309612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Risk factors for fracture in middle-age and older-age men of African descent.
    Sheu Y; Cauley JA; Patrick AL; Wheeler VW; Bunker CH; Zmuda JM
    J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Jan; 29(1):234-41. PubMed ID: 23775783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. From fracture risk prediction to evaluating fracture patterns: recent advances in the epidemiology of osteoporosis.
    Wright NC; Saag KG
    Curr Rheumatol Rep; 2012 Jun; 14(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 22453874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool May Not Indicate Bone Fragility in Women With Type 2 Diabetes.
    Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
    Am J Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 360(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 32376002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.