These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22455175)

  • 61. Understanding the outcomes of multi-centre clinical trials: a qualitative study of health professional experiences and views.
    Lawton J; Jenkins N; Darbyshire J; Farmer A; Holman R; Hallowell N
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Feb; 74(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 22236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Peer Review Processes for Quality Improvement in Health Care Settings and Their Implications for Health Care Professionals: A Meta-Ethnography.
    Tang S; Bowles A; Minns Lowe C
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2022 Apr; 42(2):115-124. PubMed ID: 34799519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A qualitative study on relationships and perceptions between managers and clinicians and its effect on value-based healthcare within the national health service in the UK.
    Ng SM
    Health Serv Manage Res; 2022 Nov; 35(4):251-258. PubMed ID: 35135341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Reducing imaging waiting times: enhanced roles and service-redesign.
    Greaves C; Gilmore J; Bernhardt L; Ross L
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2013; 26(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23729124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Frameworks for change in healthcare organisations: a formative evaluation of the NHS Change Model.
    Martin GP; Sutton E; Willars J; Dixon-Woods M
    Health Serv Manage Res; 2013 Aug; 26(2-3):65-75. PubMed ID: 25595003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Service design. Down a new patient pathway.
    Hollins L; Hawdon J; Auckland G; Roberts J; Jago A; Knowles C; Peters J; Green J; Bhardwa J
    Health Serv J; 2014 Jan; 124(6382):19. PubMed ID: 24640446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Using Behavior Change Interventions in Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Perspectives from Healthcare Professionals in the United Kingdom.
    Whittaker EM; Levy AR; Matata B; Kinnafick FE; Midgley AW
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Subjective experience or objective process: understanding the gap between values and practice for involving patients in designing patient-centred care.
    Lord L; Gale N
    J Health Organ Manag; 2014; 28(6):714-30. PubMed ID: 25420353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Peer review of cancer multidisciplinary teams: is it acceptable in Australia?
    Slavova-Azmanova NS; Johnson CE; Platell C; Bydder S; Saunders CM
    Med J Aust; 2015 Feb; 202(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 25669477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Influencing sceptical staff to become supporters of service improvement: a qualitative study of doctors' and managers' views.
    Gollop R; Whitby E; Buchanan D; Ketley D
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Apr; 13(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 15069217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. ED healthcare professionals and their notions of productivity.
    Moffatt F; Timmons S; Coffey F
    Emerg Med J; 2016 Nov; 33(11):789-793. PubMed ID: 27073111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. What makes British general practitioners take part in a quality improvement scheme?
    Spooner A; Chapple A; Roland M
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2001 Jul; 6(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 11467271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluating the impact of accreditation and external peer review.
    Kilsdonk M; Siesling S; Otter R; Harten Wv
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2015; 28(8):757-77. PubMed ID: 26440481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Clinical practice visits: a rapid review.
    Forel D; Marlow N; Vandepeer M; Hill AG
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Sep; 89(9):1004-1008. PubMed ID: 30845372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Improving care for people after stroke: how change was actively facilitated.
    Bamford D; Rothwell K; Tyrrell P; Boaden R
    J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(5):548-60. PubMed ID: 24341176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. "The people not the policy": quality improvement, junior doctors, and cultural change.
    Grant P
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2011; 20(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 21725215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Value-based healthcare as a trigger for improvement initiatives.
    Nilsson K; Bååthe F; Erichsen Andersson A; Sandoff M
    Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl); 2017 Oct; 30(4):364-377. PubMed ID: 28862085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: views of hospital staff in the UK.
    Shebl N; Franklin B; Barber N; Burnett S; Parand A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2012 Jan; 17(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 21967824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Paired learning - improving collaboration between clinicians and managers.
    Houston JFB; Morgan JE
    J Health Organ Manag; 2018 Mar; 32(1):101-112. PubMed ID: 29508670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A study of the criteria used by healthcare professionals, managers and patients to represent and evaluate quality care.
    Attree M
    J Nurs Manag; 2001 Mar; 9(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 11879448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.