557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22455691)
1. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The significance of the amount of myometrial invasion in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma.
Alektiar KM; McKee A; Lin O; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ; Mychalczak BR; McKee B; Hoskins WJ; Barakat RR
Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 12124832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary: review of 43 cases].
Ma SK; Zhang HT; Sun YC; Wu LY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 30(9):690-4. PubMed ID: 19173912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pelvic lymphadenectomy as an alternative to adjuvant radiotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer at high risk of recurrent lymphatic metastases (stage I)].
Amato NA; Partipilo V; Mele F; Boscia F; De Marzo P
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Feb; 61(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 19204656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A suggested modification to FIGO stage I endometrial cancer.
Aristizabal P; Graesslin O; Barranger E; Clavel-Chapelon F; Haddad B; Luton D; Darai E; Rouzier R; Koskas M
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 24631453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.
Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Impact of surgical resection extent on the prognosis of clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma].
Yan X; Gao YN; Jiang GQ; Gao M; An N
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 31(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19615262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the type of surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer affect the rate of reported lymphovascular space invasion in final pathology specimens?
Momeni M; Kolev V; Cardenas-Goicoechea J; Getrajdman J; Fishman D; Chuang L; Kalir T; Rahaman J; Zakashansky K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23099190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravaginal brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Alektiar KM; Venkatraman E; Chi DS; Barakat RR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15850910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Survival, prognostic factors and modern tendencies in adjuvant treatment of diagnosed endometrial cancer patients with or without lymph node dissection].
Ivanov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2009; 48 Suppl 1():3-11. PubMed ID: 20387272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical analysis on the lymph nodes metastasis characters and their relation with the prognosis of the endometrial carcinoma patients].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 46(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 21781585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Treatment and prognostic analysis of ovarian cancer patients with isolated region of lymph node recurrence].
Tu H; Huang H; Huang QD; Li Z; Feng YL; Liu JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 47(12):928-33. PubMed ID: 23324194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
