These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22456173)

  • 1. [Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis--the 2010 revision of the McDonald criteria].
    Mathiesen HK; Sørensen PS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Mar; 174(13):862-5. PubMed ID: 22456173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: revision of the McDonald criteria].
    Mathiesen HK; Ravnborg MH; Sørensen PS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Nov; 169(45):3853-6. PubMed ID: 18031657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, clinical course and differential diagnosis].
    Tomioka R; Matsui M
    Nihon Rinsho; 2014 Nov; 72(11):1957-63. PubMed ID: 25518377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the 2010 McDonald multiple sclerosis criteria in children with a clinically isolated syndrome.
    Kornek B; Schmitl B; Vass K; Zehetmayer S; Pritsch M; Penzien J; Karenfort M; Blaschek A; Seidl R; Prayer D; Rostasy K
    Mult Scler; 2012 Dec; 18(12):1768-74. PubMed ID: 22526931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [New diagnostic criteria in multiple sclerosis].
    Midgard R; Beiske AG; Celius EG; Jensen D; Hovdal H; Mellgren SI; Myhr KM
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 May; 123(10):1345-8. PubMed ID: 12806674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.
    Przybek J; Gniatkowska I; Mirowska-Guzel D; Członkowska A
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2015; 49(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 26377983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].
    Matsui M; Nagayama S
    Nihon Rinsho; 2013 May; 71(5):811-6. PubMed ID: 23777087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective comparison of the original and revised McDonald criteria in a general neurology practice in Ireland.
    McHugh JC; Galvin PL; Murphy RP
    Mult Scler; 2008 Jan; 14(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17942523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tangled web: don't miss multiple sclerosis.
    Burdett SK
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2005 Nov; 13(11):51-3, 56. PubMed ID: 16295004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 2017 McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis: Earlier diagnosis with reduced specificity?
    Gobbin F; Zanoni M; Marangi A; Orlandi R; Crestani L; Benedetti MD; Gajofatto A
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2019 Apr; 29():23-25. PubMed ID: 30658260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MS, MRI, and the 2010 McDonald criteria: a Canadian expert commentary.
    Selchen D; Bhan V; Blevins G; Devonshire V; Duquette P; Grand'Maison F; Kremenchutzky M; Lapierre Y; Li D; von Riedemann SJ; Freedman M
    Neurology; 2012 Dec; 79(23 Suppl 2):S1-15. PubMed ID: 23212280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of conventional high-field MRI in MS in the light of the McDonald criteria: a literature review.
    Lunde Larsen LS; Larsson HB; Frederiksen JL
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2010 Sep; 122(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 20597869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and magnetic resonance imaging criteria.
    Nielsen JM; Korteweg T; Barkhof F; Uitdehaag BM; Polman CH
    Ann Neurol; 2005 Nov; 58(5):781-3. PubMed ID: 16240352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis].
    Mathiesen HK; Ravnborg M; Sørensen PS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Aug; 170(34):2579-81. PubMed ID: 18761844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Magnetic resonance and multiple sclerosis I. Conventional diagnostic techniques].
    Mathiesen HK; Langkilde AR; Larsson HB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1026-31. PubMed ID: 11894702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2010 McDonald criteria for diagnosing pediatric multiple sclerosis.
    Sadaka Y; Verhey LH; Shroff MM; Branson HM; Arnold DL; Narayanan S; Sled JG; Bar-Or A; Sadovnick AD; McGowan M; Marrie RA; Banwell B;
    Ann Neurol; 2012 Aug; 72(2):211-23. PubMed ID: 22926854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: comparison of the Poser criteria and the new McDonald criteria.
    Fangerau T; Schimrigk S; Haupts M; Kaeder M; Ahle G; Brune N; Klinkenberg K; Kotterba S; Möhring M; Sindern E;
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2004 Jun; 109(6):385-9. PubMed ID: 15147460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study of visual evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis].
    Miletto G; Merlihot JM; Nezri M; Stanoyevitch JF; Pernet-Rambaud C; Houis B
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 3385127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria.
    Simó M; Barsi P; Arányi Z
    Mult Scler; 2008 May; 14(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 18208873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].
    Yang CC
    Acta Neurol Taiwan; 2005 Dec; 14(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 16425550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.