These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22456194)

  • 1. Differential profiles of crack users in respondent-driven and institutional samples: a three-site comparison.
    Oteo Pérez A; Benschop A; Korf DJ
    Eur Addict Res; 2012; 18(4):184-92. PubMed ID: 22456194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Respondent-driven sampling in the recruitment of illicit stimulant drug users in a rural setting: findings and technical issues.
    Wang J; Falck RS; Li L; Rahman A; Carlson RG
    Addict Behav; 2007 May; 32(5):924-37. PubMed ID: 16901654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the prevalence of crack dependence using capture-recapture with institutional and field data: a three-city study in The Netherlands.
    Pérez AO; Cruyff MJ; Benschop A; Korf DJ
    Subst Use Misuse; 2013 Jan; 48(1-2):173-80. PubMed ID: 23368703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Criminal involvement and crime specialization among crack users in the Netherlands.
    Oteo Pérez A; Benschop A; Blanken P; Korf DJ
    Eur Addict Res; 2015; 21(2):53-62. PubMed ID: 25402472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subpopulations of illicit drug users reached by targeted street outreach and respondent-driven sampling strategies: implications for research and public health practice.
    Rudolph AE; Crawford ND; Latkin C; Heimer R; Benjamin EO; Jones KC; Fuller CM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):280-9. PubMed ID: 21376275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drug use patterns of adult crack users in street versus residential treatment samples.
    Pottieger AE; Tressell PA; Surratt HL; Inciardi JA; Chitwood DD
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 1995; 27(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 7602437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crack across Canada: Comparing crack users and crack non-users in a Canadian multi-city cohort of illicit opioid users.
    Fischer B; Rehm J; Patra J; Kalousek K; Haydon E; Tyndall M; El-Guebaly N
    Addiction; 2006 Dec; 101(12):1760-70. PubMed ID: 17156175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection among pregnant crack cocaine users in a rural community.
    Ellerbrock TV; Harrington PE; Bush TJ; Schoenfisch SA; Oxtoby MJ; Witte JJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 7651651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From the first drug to crack: the sequence of drugs taken in a group of users in the city of São Paulo.
    van der Meer Sanchez Z; Nappo SA
    Subst Use Misuse; 2007; 42(1):177-88. PubMed ID: 17366132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is crack cocaine use associated with greater violence than powdered cocaine use? Results from a national sample.
    Vaughn MG; Fu Q; Perron BE; Bohnert AS; Howard MO
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2010 Jul; 36(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 20560836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Respondent-driven sampling and the recruitment of people with small injecting networks.
    Paquette D; Bryant J; de Wit J
    AIDS Behav; 2012 May; 16(4):890-9. PubMed ID: 21874352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demographic, HIV risk behavior, and health status characteristics of "crack" cocaine injectors compared to other injection drug users in three New England cities.
    Buchanan D; Tooze JA; Shaw S; Kinzly M; Heimer R; Singer M
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2006 Feb; 81(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 16171952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Respondent-driven sampling in a syringe exchange setting.
    Hakansson A; Isendahl P; Wallin C; Berglund M
    Scand J Public Health; 2012 Dec; 40(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 23221914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respondent-driven sampling in a study of drug users in New York City: notes from the field.
    McKnight C; Des Jarlais D; Bramson H; Tower L; Abdul-Quader AS; Nemeth C; Heckathorn D
    J Urban Health; 2006 Nov; 83(6 Suppl):i54-9. PubMed ID: 16977493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HIV-related risk behaviors among cocaine users.
    Khalsa HK; Kowalewski MR; Anglin MD; Wang J
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1992; 4(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 1311941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crack use in Puerto Rico: evidence of a recent epidemic.
    Matos TD; Robles RR; Marrero CA; Colón HM
    P R Health Sci J; 1996 Sep; 15(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 8994288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment.
    Wang J; Carlson RG; Falck RS; Siegal HA; Rahman A; Li L
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 May; 78(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 15845318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cocaine and crack users compared.
    Ringwalt CL; Palmer JH
    Adolescence; 1989; 24(96):851-9. PubMed ID: 2610033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the geographic coverage and spatial clustering of illicit drug users recruited through respondent-driven sampling in New York City.
    Rudolph AE; Young AM; Lewis CF
    J Urban Health; 2015 Apr; 92(2):352-78. PubMed ID: 25694223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crack/cocaine use in a rural county of England.
    Vivancos R; Maskrey V; Rumball D; Harvey I; Holland R
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Jun; 28(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 16648147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.