These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22456890)

  • 1. Tradeoffs limit the evolution of male traits that are attractive to females.
    Wagner WE; Beckers OM; Tolle AE; Basolo AL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jul; 279(1739):2899-906. PubMed ID: 22456890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relative importance of different direct benefits in the mate choices of a field cricket.
    Wagner WE; Basolo AL
    Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 17348924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female life span and fertility are increased by the ejaculates of preferred males.
    Wagner WE; Harper CJ
    Evolution; 2003 Sep; 57(9):2054-66. PubMed ID: 14575327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phenotypic variation and covariation indicate high evolvability of acoustic communication in crickets.
    Blankers T; Lübke AK; Hennig RM
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1656-69. PubMed ID: 26134540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of calling song and courtship song in female mate choice in the variable field cricket.
    Wagner WE; Reiser MG
    Anim Behav; 2000 Jun; 59(6):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 10877901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parasitoid infestation changes female mating preferences.
    Beckers OM; Wagner WE
    Anim Behav; 2013 Apr; 85(4):. PubMed ID: 24347669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False promises: females spurn cheating males in a field cricket.
    Wagner WE; Smith AR; Basolo AL
    Biol Lett; 2007 Aug; 3(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 17567551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Costly signals in a field cricket can indicate high- or low-quality direct benefits depending upon the environment.
    Tolle AE; Wagner WE
    Evolution; 2011 Jan; 65(1):283-94. PubMed ID: 20825479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female field crickets incur increased parasitism risk when near preferred song.
    Martin CM; Wagner WE
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9592. PubMed ID: 20231888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivariate female preference tests reveal latent perceptual biases.
    Gray DA; Gabel E; Blankers T; Hennig RM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Nov; 283(1842):. PubMed ID: 27807265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus.
    Simmons LW; Zuk M; Rotenberry JT
    Evolution; 2001 Jul; 55(7):1386-94. PubMed ID: 11525462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Along came a spider who sat down beside her: Perceived predation risk, but not female age, affects female mate choosiness.
    Atwell A; Wagner WE
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():143-8. PubMed ID: 25857998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strength of female mate preferences in temperature manipulation study supports the signal reliability hypothesis.
    Cobb NE; Mason SM; Tompkins K; Fitschen-Brown M; Rios-Cardenas O; Morris MR
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303691. PubMed ID: 38843264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Condition-Dependent Mutual Mate Preference and Intersexual Genetic Correlations for Mating Activity.
    Han CS; Brooks RC; Dingemanse NJ
    Am Nat; 2020 Jun; 195(6):997-1008. PubMed ID: 32469657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple genetic linkages between female preference and male signal in rapidly speciating Hawaiian crickets.
    Wiley C; Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2010 Aug; 64(8):2238-45. PubMed ID: 20394669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eavesdropping parasitoids do not cause the evolution of less conspicuous signalling behaviour in a field cricket.
    Beckers OM; Wagner WE
    Anim Behav; 2012 Dec; 84(6):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 23888083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2087-98. PubMed ID: 19473387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical linkage and mate preference generate linkage disequilibrium for behavioral isolation in two parapatric crickets.
    Blankers T; Berdan EL; Hennig RM; Mayer F
    Evolution; 2019 Apr; 73(4):777-791. PubMed ID: 30820950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tradeoffs explain scaling, sex differences, and seasonal oscillations in the remarkable weapons of snapping shrimp (
    Dinh JP; Patek SN
    Elife; 2023 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 37158689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition of variable courtship song in the field cricket Gryllus assimilis.
    Vedenina VY; Pollack GS
    J Exp Biol; 2012 Jul; 215(Pt 13):2210-9. PubMed ID: 22675181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.