158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22457714)
1. Sample size under inverse negative binomial group testing for accuracy in parameter estimation.
Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Eskridge K
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32250. PubMed ID: 22457714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of 7 methods for sample size determination based on confidence interval estimation for a single proportion].
Yu M; Shi X; Zou B; An S
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2023 Jan; 43(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 36856217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel confidence interval for a single proportion in the presence of clustered binary outcome data.
Short MI; Cabral HJ; Weinberg JM; LaValley MP; Massaro JM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jan; 29(1):111-121. PubMed ID: 30672389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical inference involving binomial and negative binomial parameters.
García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):288-307. PubMed ID: 19476241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On tests of rate ratio under standard inverse sampling.
Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Mar; 89(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 18164512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An optimization approach to calculating sample sizes with binary responses.
Maroufy V; Marriott P; Pezeshk H
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):715-31. PubMed ID: 24697665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The parasite capacity of the host population].
Kozminskiĭ EV
Parazitologiia; 2002; 36(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11965643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias and precision of some classical ANOVA effect sizes when assumptions are violated.
Troncoso Skidmore S; Thompson B
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):536-46. PubMed ID: 23055163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independence estimating equations for controlled clinical trials with small sample sizes--interval estimation.
Dahmen G; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16964361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy in parameter estimation for ANCOVA and ANOVA contrasts: sample size planning via narrow confidence intervals.
Lai K; Kelley K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 May; 65(2):350-70. PubMed ID: 22004142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comment on sample size calculations for binomial confidence intervals.
Wei L; Hutson AD
J Appl Stat; 2013 Feb; 40(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 26989292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating prevalence: a confidence game.
Zelmer DA
J Parasitol; 2013 Apr; 99(2):386-9. PubMed ID: 23016891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating negative likelihood ratio confidence when test sensitivity is 100%: A bootstrapping approach.
Marill KA; Chang Y; Wong KF; Friedman AB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1936-1948. PubMed ID: 26152746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
Lui KJ; Chang KC
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size calculation for comparing two negative binomial rates.
Zhu H; Lakkis H
Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):376-87. PubMed ID: 24038204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Misclassified group-tested current status data.
Petito LC; Jewell NP
Biometrika; 2016 Dec; 103(4):801-815. PubMed ID: 29422690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for the standardized mean difference effect size between two normal populations under heteroscedasticity.
Shieh G
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):955-67. PubMed ID: 23468180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2857-66. PubMed ID: 16134167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
Lai K; Kelley K
Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Estimation of vector prevalence by using pool sampling].
Gu W
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 1998; 16(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 12078204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
