These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22457714)

  • 21. Revisiting sample size planning for receiver operating characteristic studies: A confidence interval approach with precision and assurance.
    Shu D; Zou G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):748-759. PubMed ID: 36727203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sample size calculations for the differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data using a negative binomial regression model.
    Li X; Wu D; Cooper NGF; Rai SN
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2019 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 30667368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New method to estimate the sample size for calculation of a proportion assuming binomial distribution.
    Vallejo A; Muniesa A; Ferreira C; de Blas I
    Res Vet Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 23623739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exact change point detection with improved power in small-sample binomial sequences.
    Ellenberger D; Lausen B; Friede T
    Biom J; 2021 Mar; 63(3):558-574. PubMed ID: 33151005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sample size determination for confidence intervals of interaction effects in moderated multiple regression with continuous predictor and moderator variables.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):824-35. PubMed ID: 20805605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Probabilistic precision calculations for the planning of studies assessing negative binomial rates.
    Hedberg J; Franzén S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2024 Feb; 33(2):e5750. PubMed ID: 38362649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits.
    Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimum Sample Size to Estimate Mean Parasite Abundance in Fish Parasite Surveys.
    Shvydka S; Sarabeev V; Estruch VD; Cadarso-Suárez C
    Helminthologia; 2018 Mar; 55(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 31662627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing standardized contrast effects in ANCOVA: Confidence intervals, precision evaluations, and sample size requirements.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0282161. PubMed ID: 36827246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confidence intervals for proportion ratios of stratified correlated bilateral data.
    Zhuang T; Tian GL; Ma CX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):203-225. PubMed ID: 30010492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maximum likelihood estimation of the negative binomial dispersion parameter for highly overdispersed data, with applications to infectious diseases.
    Lloyd-Smith JO
    PLoS One; 2007 Feb; 2(2):e180. PubMed ID: 17299582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An analysis of eight 95 per cent confidence intervals for a ratio of Poisson parameters when events are rare.
    Barker L; Cadwell BL
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(20):4030-7. PubMed ID: 18288790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Obtaining power or obtaining precision. Delineating methods of sample-size planning.
    Kelley K; Maxwell SE; Rausch JR
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):258-87. PubMed ID: 12971200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating effective population size from temporally spaced samples with a novel, efficient maximum-likelihood algorithm.
    Hui TY; Burt A
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):285-93. PubMed ID: 25747459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing.
    Pritchard NA; Tebbs JM
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):40-56. PubMed ID: 21259308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
    Maruo K; Kawai N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter.
    Lord D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jul; 38(4):751-66. PubMed ID: 16545328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.