These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22457733)

  • 1. Advantage of hole stimulus in rivalry competition.
    Meng Q; Cui D; Zhou K; Chen L; Ma Y
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33053. PubMed ID: 22457733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing of invisible stimuli: advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression.
    Jiang Y; Costello P; He S
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Apr; 18(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 17470261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interocular grouping without awareness.
    Lin SY; Yeh SL
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():23-30. PubMed ID: 26851342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry, and continuous flash suppression.
    Ding Y; Naber M; Gayet S; Van der Stigchel S; Paffen CLE
    J Vis; 2018 Jun; 18(6):6. PubMed ID: 30029217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review.
    Sterzer P; Stein T; Ludwig K; Rothkirch M; Hesselmann G
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():453. PubMed ID: 24904469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry.
    Paffen CL; Naber M; Verstraten FA
    PLoS One; 2008 Jun; 3(6):e2311. PubMed ID: 18545647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual suppression at the offset of binocular rivalry.
    de Graaf TA; van Ee R; Croonenberg D; Klink PC; Sack AT
    J Vis; 2017 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28056136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.
    Sutoyo D; Srinivasan R
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():245-55. PubMed ID: 18952069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new 'CFS tracking' paradigm reveals uniform suppression depth regardless of target complexity or salience.
    Alais D; Coorey J; Blake R; Davidson MJ
    Elife; 2024 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 38682887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Less Is More: Semantic Information Survives Interocular Suppression When Attention Is Diverted.
    Eo K; Cha O; Chong SC; Kang MS
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(20):5489-97. PubMed ID: 27194329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual grouping without awareness: superiority of Kanizsa triangle in breaking interocular suppression.
    Wang L; Weng X; He S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e40106. PubMed ID: 22768232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CFS-crafter: An open-source tool for creating and analyzing images for continuous flash suppression experiments.
    Wang G; Alais D; Blake R; Han S
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):2004-2020. PubMed ID: 35794414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression.
    Moors P; Huygelier H; Wagemans J; de-Wit L; van Ee R
    Iperception; 2015; 6(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 26034573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical "blinding" methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing.
    Breitmeyer BG
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():234-50. PubMed ID: 25704454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic analysis does not occur in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression.
    Kang MS; Blake R; Woodman GF
    J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 31(38):13535-45. PubMed ID: 21940445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry share a common neural substrate.
    Petruk V; He B; Engel S; He S
    J Vis; 2018 Sep; 18(9):18. PubMed ID: 30372752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactile motion biases visual motion perception in binocular rivalry.
    Hense M; Badde S; Röder B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1715-1724. PubMed ID: 30815794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Mitchell JF; Stoner GR; Reynolds JH
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):410-3. PubMed ID: 15164062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye dominance alternations in binocular rivalry do not require visual awareness.
    Platonov A; Goossens J
    J Vis; 2014 Sep; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 25183877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
    Logothetis NK; Leopold DA; Sheinberg DL
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6575):621-4. PubMed ID: 8602261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.