176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22457993)
1. Science convicting the innocent.
Berger K
Med Law; 2010 Mar; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22457993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal framework for more robust forensic science evidence.
Rt Hon. the Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality management systems and the admissibility of scientific evidence: the Costa Rican experience.
Salas M; Gomez D
Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21338026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):913-7. PubMed ID: 21729081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
Edmond G
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science.
Saks MJ; Koehler JJ
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):892-5. PubMed ID: 16081727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion.
Association of Forensic Science Providers
Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 19839414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
Klee CH; Friedman HJ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Label the limits of forensic science.
Mejia R
Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7648):7. PubMed ID: 28383000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Criminal court expert reports].
Fontaine L
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2011 Apr; 112(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 20688347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forensic science standards in fast-changing environments.
Sommer P
Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 20408377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
Zlotnick J; Lin JR
Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commentary on: Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(4):913-7.
Hart RP
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):278. PubMed ID: 22150396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Strengthening forensic science: a way station on the journey to justice.
Bohan TL
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 20412154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Will the law come running? The potential role of "brain fingerprinting" in crime investigation and adjudication in Australia.
Dickson K; McMahon M
J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):204-22. PubMed ID: 16304761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Weakening forensic science in Spain: from expert evidence to documentary evidence.
Lucena-Molina JJ; Pardo-Iranzo V; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):952-63. PubMed ID: 22329955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice.
Roberts P
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 23022585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
