BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22458496)

  • 1. Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts.
    Hong MK; Yao HH; Rzetelski-West K; Namdarian B; Pedersen J; Peters JS; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():57-63. PubMed ID: 22458496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Lee JS; Chung BH
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
    Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
    Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
    Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
    Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
    Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
    Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
    Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
    Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified prostate volume algorithm improves transrectal US volume estimation in men presenting for prostate brachytherapy.
    MacMahon PJ; Kennedy AM; Murphy DT; Maher M; McNicholas MM
    Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 19092098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy.
    Sajadi KP; Terris MK; Hamilton RJ; Cullen J; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):990-5. PubMed ID: 17632170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate volume measured preoperatively predicts for organ-confined disease in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Bianco FJ; Mallah KN; Korets R; Hricak H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 17320675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
    Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Clarius, Handheld Wireless Point-of-Care Ultrasound, in Evaluating Prostate Morphology and Volume Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight: Is There a Difference between Transabdominal
    Moussaoui G; Zakaria AS; Negrean C; Nguyen DD; Couture F; Tholomier C; Sadri I; Arezki A; Schwartz RN; Elterman DS; Misrai V; Bhojani N; Herrmann TRW; Zorn KC
    J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1300-1306. PubMed ID: 33677990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of transrectal saturation biopsy in tumour localization: pathological correlation after retropubic radical prostatectomy and implication for focal ablative therapy.
    Abdollah F; Scattoni V; Raber M; Roscigno M; Briganti A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Capitanio U; Freschi M; Salonia A; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 21087451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
    Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.
    Park SB; Kim JK; Choi SH; Noh HN; Ji EK; Cho KS
    Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11752939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Average Weight of Seminal Vesicles: An Adjustment Factor for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Weighed With Seminal Vesicles.
    Tjionas GA; Epstein JI; Williamson SR; Diaz M; Menon M; Peabody JO; Gupta NS; Parekh DJ; Cote RJ; Jorda M; Kryvenko ON
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2015 Dec; 23(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 26306700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A reliability analysis of transrectal echographic estimation of prostatic volume].
    Llanes González L; Luján Galán M; Páez Borda A; Ruíz Rubio JL; Fernández González I; Berenguer Sánchez A
    Actas Urol Esp; 1999 Jan; 23(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10089627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is PSA density still useful in diagnosing prostate cancer?
    Pepe P; Candiano G; Fraggetta F; Galia A; Grasso G; Allegro R; Aragona F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2009 Dec; 81(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 20608140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of PSA density by 3 imaging modalities and its correlation with the PSA density of radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Varkarakis I; Zarkadoulias A; Bourdoumis A; Chatzidarellis E; Antoniou N; Deliveliotis C
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1038-42. PubMed ID: 22196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.