107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22459184)
1. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies.
Mobbs RJ; Sivabalan P; Li J
J Clin Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 19(6):829-35. PubMed ID: 22459184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Wang HL; Lü FZ; Jiang JY; Ma X; Xia XL; Wang LX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 22340311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Rosen DS; Ferguson SD; Ogden AT; Huo D; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2008 Nov; 63(5):956-60; discussion 960. PubMed ID: 19005386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques.
Bagan B; Patel N; Deutsch H; Harrop J; Sharan A; Vaccaro AR; Ratliff JK
Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():281-6. PubMed ID: 18802914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar instability by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Liang B; Yin G; Zhao J; Li N; Hu Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1449-54. PubMed ID: 22242343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
Glassman S; Gornet MF; Branch C; Polly D; Peloza J; Schwender JD; Carreon L
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mini-open versus open decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
Harris EB; Sayadipour A; Massey P; Duplantier NL; Anderson DG
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Dec; 40(12):E257-61. PubMed ID: 22268018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome.
Anand N; Hamilton JF; Perri B; Miraliakbar H; Goldstein T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):E748-53. PubMed ID: 16985443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws: comparison to muscle damage and minimally invasive techniques.
Dickerman RD; East JW; Winters K; Tackett J; Hajovsky-Pietla A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):E923-5. PubMed ID: 19940722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Lee SH; Choi WG; Lim SR; Kang HY; Shin SW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):644-9. PubMed ID: 15541696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Tangviriyapaiboon T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1368-76. PubMed ID: 18843866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study.
Anand N; Baron EM; Thaiyananthan G; Khalsa K; Goldstein TB
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):459-67. PubMed ID: 18836355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of single intervertebral cage and single side pedicle screw fixation versus bilateral cages and screw fixation.
Moreland DB; Asch HL; Czajka GA; Overkamp JA; Sitzman DM
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2009 Jun; 52(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 19650016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significantly improved outcomes with a less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion incorporating total facetectomy.
Kasis AG; Marshman LA; Krishna M; Bhatia CK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 19282736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
