These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22459559)

  • 1. Effects of modality on memory for original and misleading information.
    Dijkstra K; Moerman EM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22459559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
    Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
    Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Rubin DC; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1730-40. PubMed ID: 21396384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latency of modality-specific reactivation of auditory and visual information during episodic memory retrieval.
    Ueno D; Masumoto K; Sutani K; Iwaki S
    Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 25756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterizing the neural correlates of modality-specific and modality-independent accessibility and availability signals in memory using partial-least squares.
    Salami A; Eriksson J; Kompus K; Habib R; Kauppi K; Nyberg L
    Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(2):686-98. PubMed ID: 20420925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory for sound, with an ear toward hearing in complex auditory scenes.
    Snyder JS; Gregg MK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 21809152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall.
    Harvey AJ; Beaman CP
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):693-700. PubMed ID: 17924278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
    Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Process dissociation between contextual retrieval and item recognition.
    Weis S; Specht K; Klaver P; Tendolkar I; Willmes K; Ruhlmann J; Elger CE; Fernández G
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2729-33. PubMed ID: 15597043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The co-witness misinformation effect: memory blends or memory compliance?
    Skagerberg EM; Wright DB
    Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 18432487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Osborn K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 19271869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.
    Vachon F; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 21895389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses.
    Chan JC; Langley MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
    Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.