174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22459559)
1. Effects of modality on memory for original and misleading information.
Dijkstra K; Moerman EM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22459559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
Pierce BH; Gallo DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.
Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Rubin DC; Daselaar SM
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1730-40. PubMed ID: 21396384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Latency of modality-specific reactivation of auditory and visual information during episodic memory retrieval.
Ueno D; Masumoto K; Sutani K; Iwaki S
Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 25756907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing the neural correlates of modality-specific and modality-independent accessibility and availability signals in memory using partial-least squares.
Salami A; Eriksson J; Kompus K; Habib R; Kauppi K; Nyberg L
Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(2):686-98. PubMed ID: 20420925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Memory for sound, with an ear toward hearing in complex auditory scenes.
Snyder JS; Gregg MK
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 21809152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall.
Harvey AJ; Beaman CP
Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):693-700. PubMed ID: 17924278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
Mate J; Baqués J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Process dissociation between contextual retrieval and item recognition.
Weis S; Specht K; Klaver P; Tendolkar I; Willmes K; Ruhlmann J; Elger CE; Fernández G
Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2729-33. PubMed ID: 15597043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The co-witness misinformation effect: memory blends or memory compliance?
Skagerberg EM; Wright DB
Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 18432487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The modality-match effect in recognition memory.
Mulligan NW; Osborn K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 19271869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.
Vachon F; Hughes RW; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 21895389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses.
Chan JC; Langley MM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
