These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22459560)

  • 1. Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect.
    Elliott EM; Briganti AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 22459560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Dentale S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1542-57. PubMed ID: 22612161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?
    Bell R; Mund I; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 20544562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What characterizes changing-state speech in affecting short-term memory? An EEG study on the irrelevant sound effect.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Weisz N; Bertrand O
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1669-80. PubMed ID: 22067074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences and format effects in working memory.
    Foos PW; Goolkasian P
    Exp Aging Res; 2010 Jul; 36(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 20544448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
    Eagan DE; Chein JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
    Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing speed, attentional capacity, and age-related memory change.
    Levitt T; Fugelsang J; Crossley M
    Exp Aging Res; 2006; 32(3):263-95. PubMed ID: 16754468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
    Bell R; Dentale S; Buchner A; Mayr S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EMDR and mindfulness. Eye movements and attentional breathing tax working memory and reduce vividness and emotionality of aversive ideation.
    van den Hout MA; Engelhard IM; Beetsma D; Slofstra C; Hornsveld H; Houtveen J; Leer A
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 42(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 21570931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control.
    Minamoto T; Osaka M; Osaka N
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1335():63-73. PubMed ID: 20381462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.