These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22460082)

  • 1. A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator.
    Kirkegaard K; Hindkjaer JJ; Grøndahl ML; Kesmodel US; Ingerslev HJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2012 Jun; 29(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 22460082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT.
    Park H; Bergh C; Selleskog U; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Lundin K
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 25432920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blastocyst development in single medium with or without renewal on day 3: a prospective cohort study on sibling donor oocytes in a time-lapse incubator.
    Costa-Borges N; Bellés M; Meseguer M; Galliano D; Ballesteros A; Calderón G
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):707-713. PubMed ID: 26690010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Embryo and Clinical Outcomes in Different Types of Incubator Between Two Different Embryo Culture Systems.
    Ueno S; Ito M; Shimazaki K; Okimura T; Uchiyama K; Yabuuchi A; Kato K
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Aug; 28(8):2301-2309. PubMed ID: 33751461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled trial comparing embryo culture in two incubator systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope.
    Barberet J; Chammas J; Bruno C; Valot E; Vuillemin C; Jonval L; Choux C; Sagot P; Soudry A; Fauque P
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):302-309.e1. PubMed ID: 29175066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of embryo implantation potential between time-lapse incubators and standard incubators: a randomized controlled study.
    Zhang XD; Zhang Q; Han W; Liu WW; Shen XL; Yao GD; Shi SL; Hu LL; Wang SS; Wang JX; Zhou JJ; Kang WW; Zhang HD; Luo C; Yu Q; Liu RZ; Sun YP; Sun HX; Wang XH; Quan S; Huang GN
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov; 45(5):858-866. PubMed ID: 36210273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnancy rates of day 4 and day 5 embryos after culture in an integrated time-lapse incubator.
    Holschbach V; Weigert J; Dietrich JE; Roesner S; Montag M; Strowitzki T; Toth B
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 May; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 28482910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved embryonic development and utilization rates with EmbryoScope: a within-subject comparison versus a benchtop incubator.
    Setti AS; Braga DPAF; Vingris L; Iaconelli A; Borges E
    Zygote; 2022 Oct; 30(5):633-637. PubMed ID: 35674243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sibling oocytes cultured in a time-lapse versus benchtop incubator: how time-lapse incubators improve blastocyst development and euploid rate.
    Nobrega NG; Abdala A; El-Damen A; Arnanz A; Bayram A; Elkhatib I; Lawrenz B; Fatemi H; De Munck N
    Zygote; 2023 Aug; 31(4):402-409. PubMed ID: 37226769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the development of human embryos cultured in either an EmbryoScope or benchtop incubator.
    Sciorio R; Thong JK; Pickering SJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Mar; 35(3):515-522. PubMed ID: 29243141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Live birth rate following undisturbed embryo culture at low oxygen in a time-lapse incubator compared to a high-quality benchtop incubator.
    Kalleas D; McEvoy K; Horne G; Roberts SA; Brison DR
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2022 Feb; 25(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 32098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the safety of time-lapse observations for human embryos.
    Nakahara T; Iwase A; Goto M; Harata T; Suzuki M; Ienaga M; Kobayashi H; Takikawa S; Manabe S; Kikkawa F; Ando H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2010 Feb; 27(2-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 20127164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Yang L; Cai S; Zhang S; Kong X; Gu Y; Lu C; Dai J; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):869-876. PubMed ID: 29546361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of fragmented embryos implantation potential using time-lapse technology.
    Lahav-Baratz S; Blais I; Koifman M; Dirnfeld M; Oron G
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1560-1570. PubMed ID: 36959087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-lapse monitoring of zona pellucida-free embryos obtained through in vitro fertilization: a retrospective case series.
    Bodri D; Kato R; Kondo M; Hosomi N; Katsumata Y; Kawachiya S; Matsumoto T
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):e35. PubMed ID: 25772774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope.
    Rubio I; Galán A; Larreategui Z; Ayerdi F; Bellver J; Herrero J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1287-1294.e5. PubMed ID: 25217875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B; Basile N; Pérez Albalá S; Bronet F; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1379-1385.e10. PubMed ID: 27530063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of male factor infertility on early and late morphokinetic parameters: a retrospective analysis of 4126 time-lapse monitored embryos.
    Sacha CR; Dimitriadis I; Christou G; James K; Brock ML; Rice ST; Bhowmick P; Bormann CL; Souter I
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 31960907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Humid versus dry incubator: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Fawzy M; AbdelRahman MY; Zidan MH; Abdel Hafez FF; Abdelghafar H; Al-Inany H; Bedaiwy MA
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Aug; 108(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 28651960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-Lapse Incubation for Embryo Culture-Morphokinetics and Environmental Stability May Not Be Enough: Results from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Sacks GC; Mozes H; Ronn R; Elder-Geva T; Schonberger O; Ben-Ami I; Srebnik N
    J Clin Med; 2024 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 38541926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.