These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22461900)

  • 21. Is the prediction of prognosis not improved by the seventh edition of the TNM classification for colorectal cancer? Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database.
    Gao P; Song YX; Wang ZN; Xu YY; Tong LL; Sun JX; Yu M; Xu HM
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Mar; 13():123. PubMed ID: 23496812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distant metastases in colorectal carcinoma: A proposal for a new M1 subclassification.
    Merkel S; Weber K; Croner RS; Golcher H; Göhl J; Agaimy A; Semrau S; Siebler J; Wein A; Hohenberger W; Wittekind C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1337-42. PubMed ID: 27160353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lymph nodes, tumor deposits, and TNM: are we getting better?
    Nagtegaal ID; Tot T; Jayne DG; McShane P; Nihlberg A; Marshall HC; Påhlman L; Brown JM; Guillou PJ; Quirke P
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 29(18):2487-92. PubMed ID: 21555695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.
    O'Sullivan B; Huang SH; Su J; Garden AS; Sturgis EM; Dahlstrom K; Lee N; Riaz N; Pei X; Koyfman SA; Adelstein D; Burkey BB; Friborg J; Kristensen CA; Gothelf AB; Hoebers F; Kremer B; Speel EJ; Bowles DW; Raben D; Karam SD; Yu E; Xu W
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Apr; 17(4):440-451. PubMed ID: 26936027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metastatic lymph node ratio as a better prognostic tool than the TNM system in colorectal cancer.
    Macedo F; Sequeira H; Ladeira K; Bonito N; Viana C; Martins S
    Future Oncol; 2021 Apr; 17(12):1519-1532. PubMed ID: 33626938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Synchronous Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Lymph Node Involvement Predicts Poor Outcome.
    Fu J; Jiang M; Tan Y; Yang J; Wu L; Feng L; Zheng S; Yuan Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(30):e1215. PubMed ID: 26222850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prognosis of 980 patients with gastric cancer after surgical resection.
    Wang W; Li YF; Sun XW; Chen YB; Li W; Xu DZ; Guan XX; Huang CY; Zhan YQ; Zhou ZW
    Chin J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 29(11):923-30. PubMed ID: 20979691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification.
    Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H
    Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beyond T, N and M: The impact of tumor deposits on the staging and treatment of colorectal and gastric carcinoma.
    Peparini N
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 29937162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?
    Lee SY; Hwang I; Park YS; Gardner J; Ro JY
    Int J Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 20428770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prognostic factors for T1-2 colorectal cancer after radical resection: Lymph node distribution is a valuable predictor of its survival.
    Huang X; Liu H; Liao X; Xiao Z; Huang Z; Li G
    Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):241-246. PubMed ID: 32792113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tumor-ratio-metastasis staging system as an alternative to the 7th edition UICC TNM system in gastric cancer after D2 resection--results of a single-institution study of 1343 Chinese patients.
    Wang W; Xu DZ; Li YF; Guan YX; Sun XW; Chen YB; Kesari R; Huang CY; Li W; Zhan YQ; Zhou ZW
    Ann Oncol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):2049-2056. PubMed ID: 21310759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.
    Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The lymph node status as a prognostic factor in colon cancer: comparative population study of classifications using the logarithm of the ratio between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes (LODDS) versus the pN-TNM classification and ganglion ratio systems.
    Fortea-Sanchis C; Martínez-Ramos D; Escrig-Sos J
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1208. PubMed ID: 30514228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is the N1c category of the new American Joint Committee on cancer staging system applicable to patients with rectal cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy?
    Song JS; Chang HJ; Kim DY; Kim SY; Baek JY; Park JW; Park SC; Choi HS; Oh JH
    Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(17):3917-24. PubMed ID: 21858800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of tumor deposits on the prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in stage III colorectal cancer patients with different lymph node status: A retrospective cohort study in China.
    Li X; An B; Zhao Q; Qi J; Wang W; Zhang D; Li Z; Qin C
    Int J Surg; 2018 Aug; 56():188-194. PubMed ID: 29936197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Negative prognostic impact of tumor deposits in stage III colorectal cancer patients.
    Ma T; Qin Z; Xu G; Zheng PW; Feng L; Ma D; Fu Z; Gao X
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0310327. PubMed ID: 39325798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Pathological staging criteria for carcinoma in the remnant stomach: an exploratory study].
    Gao Z; Zhao X; Jiang K; Wang B; Li Y; Ye Y; Wang S
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):514-521. PubMed ID: 29774932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Serosal surfaces, mucin pools, and deposits, oh my: challenges in staging colorectal carcinoma.
    Frankel WL; Jin M
    Mod Pathol; 2015 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S95-108. PubMed ID: 25560604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.