These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22462118)

  • 1. Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements.
    Carstensen B; Simpson J; Gurrin LC
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 16. PubMed ID: 22462118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sum of standardized residuals: Goodness-of-fit test for binary response models.
    Chen L; Sui Y; Song C; Rempala GA
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1932-1941. PubMed ID: 29579778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurements.
    Nawarathna LS; Choudhary PK
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1242-58. PubMed ID: 25614299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach.
    Stevens NT; Steiner SH; MacKay RJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2487-2504. PubMed ID: 26335274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalized Confidence Intervals for Intra- and Inter-subject Coefficients of Variation in Linear Mixed-effects Models.
    Forkman J
    Int J Biostat; 2017 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 28672773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential rank agreement methods for comparison of ranked lists.
    Ekstrøm CT; Gerds TA; Jensen AK
    Biostatistics; 2019 Oct; 20(4):582-598. PubMed ID: 29868883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sigmoidal mixed models for longitudinal data.
    Capuano AW; Wilson RS; Leurgans SE; Dawson JD; Bennett DA; Hedeker D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):863-875. PubMed ID: 27130491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handling the limit of detection by extrapolation.
    Longford NT
    Stat Med; 2012 Nov; 31(26):3133-46. PubMed ID: 22532151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Sequential Rejection Testing Method for High-Dimensional Regression with Correlated Variables.
    Mandozzi J; Bühlmann P
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 27227719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.
    Jones M; Dobson A; O'Brian S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1308-13. PubMed ID: 21737402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration of biostatistics and pharmacometrics computing platforms for efficient and reproducible PK/PD analysis: a case study.
    Ou YC; Lo A; Lee B; Liu P; Kimura K; Eary C; Hopkins A
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1112-20. PubMed ID: 23913679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the Plackett distribution with bivariate censored data.
    Ghosh D
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 7. PubMed ID: 22462114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical models for assessing agreement for quantitative data with heterogeneous random raters and replicate measurements.
    Ekstrøm CT; Carstensen B
    Int J Biostat; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38379532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restricted fence method for covariate selection in longitudinal data analysis.
    Nguyen T; Jiang J
    Biostatistics; 2012 Apr; 13(2):303-14. PubMed ID: 22180413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The analysis of 2 × 2 contingency tables--yet again.
    Richardson JT
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):890; author reply 891-2. PubMed ID: 21432882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploratory Mediation Analysis of Dichotomous Outcomes via Regularization.
    Serang S; Jacobucci R
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 31066588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are the appropriate methods for analyzing patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials when data are missing?
    Hamel JF; Sebille V; Le Neel T; Kubis G; Boyer FC; Hardouin JB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2897-2908. PubMed ID: 26546257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical methods for body mass index: A selective review.
    Yu K; Liu X; Alhamzawi R; Becker F; Lord J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):798-811. PubMed ID: 27072505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biostatistics pitfalls: Lessons learned from analysis of medical data.
    Yin G; Zhang C; Yang Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 87():105875. PubMed ID: 31676313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A goodness-of-fit test for the random-effects distribution in mixed models.
    Efendi A; Drikvandi R; Verbeke G; Molenberghs G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):970-983. PubMed ID: 25539840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.