111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22462388)
1. Care versus treatment at the end of life for profoundly disabled persons.
Spike JP
J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 22462388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surrogate medical decision making on behalf of a never-competent, profoundly intellectually disabled patient who is acutely ill.
Venkat A
J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 22462387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relation between autonomy-based rights and profoundly mentally disabled persons.
Cantor NL
Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(1):37-80, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15002181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bane of surrogate decision-making: defining the best interests of never-competent persons.
Cantor NL
J Leg Med; 2005 Jun; 26(2):155-205. PubMed ID: 16036812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Consent to care of persons with intellectual disability in Quebec: from vulnerability to capability.
Caux C; Lecomte J
Salud Publica Mex; 2017; 59(4):462-467. PubMed ID: 29211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advance directives for severely mentally and physically handicapped adults who have never been competent.
Spady DW
Bioeth Bull; 1996 Nov; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11660601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent to surgery on a mentally handicapped adult.
Bennion F
Solicit J; 1989 Feb; 133(8):245-7. PubMed ID: 11659307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Not bad enough to die: laws force life support on a man who never could consent.
Fein EB
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jul; ():B1-2. PubMed ID: 11648059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterilization of women who are mentally handicapped. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 63.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Ethics
ACOG Comm Opin; 1988 Sep; No. 63():3 p. PubMed ID: 11660331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Falling off the vine: legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment.
Harmon L
Yale Law J; 1990 Oct; 100(1):1-71. PubMed ID: 11659389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New law proposed for treating mentally incapacitated people.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6887):1226. PubMed ID: 11643132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar.
Day K
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 46(4):1380-413. PubMed ID: 11658533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model.
Haber JG
Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients.
Francis LP
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ruling on consent: protection for patients and doctors.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1989 Feb; 298(6670):348-9. PubMed ID: 11644407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Therefore choose death?
Appelbaum PS; Klein JI
Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent.
Edwards L
Jurid Rev; 1993 Jan; Part 1():52-73. PubMed ID: 11659661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
Dresser R
Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
