These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22462388)
1. Care versus treatment at the end of life for profoundly disabled persons. Spike JP J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 22462388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surrogate medical decision making on behalf of a never-competent, profoundly intellectually disabled patient who is acutely ill. Venkat A J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 22462387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relation between autonomy-based rights and profoundly mentally disabled persons. Cantor NL Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(1):37-80, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15002181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bane of surrogate decision-making: defining the best interests of never-competent persons. Cantor NL J Leg Med; 2005 Jun; 26(2):155-205. PubMed ID: 16036812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Consent to care of persons with intellectual disability in Quebec: from vulnerability to capability. Caux C; Lecomte J Salud Publica Mex; 2017; 59(4):462-467. PubMed ID: 29211268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advance directives for severely mentally and physically handicapped adults who have never been competent. Spady DW Bioeth Bull; 1996 Nov; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11660601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent to surgery on a mentally handicapped adult. Bennion F Solicit J; 1989 Feb; 133(8):245-7. PubMed ID: 11659307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Not bad enough to die: laws force life support on a man who never could consent. Fein EB N Y Times Web; 1997 Jul; ():B1-2. PubMed ID: 11648059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterilization of women who are mentally handicapped. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 63. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Ethics ACOG Comm Opin; 1988 Sep; No. 63():3 p. PubMed ID: 11660331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Falling off the vine: legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment. Harmon L Yale Law J; 1990 Oct; 100(1):1-71. PubMed ID: 11659389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New law proposed for treating mentally incapacitated people. Dyer C BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6887):1226. PubMed ID: 11643132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I. Hodgman DR; Frazer QR Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar. Day K Albany Law Rev; 1982; 46(4):1380-413. PubMed ID: 11658533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model. Haber JG Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients. Francis LP Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ruling on consent: protection for patients and doctors. Dyer C BMJ; 1989 Feb; 298(6670):348-9. PubMed ID: 11644407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Therefore choose death? Appelbaum PS; Klein JI Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent. Edwards L Jurid Rev; 1993 Jan; Part 1():52-73. PubMed ID: 11659661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]