These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants. Ormianer Z; Piek D; Livne S; Lavi D; Zafrir G; Palti A; Harel N Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 22814562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study. Babbush CA; Kanawati A J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25072734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year follow-up of wide-diameter implants placed in fresh molar extraction sockets in the mandible: immediate versus delayed loading. Prosper L; Crespi R; Valenti E; Capparé P; Gherlone E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):607-12. PubMed ID: 20556262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate postextractive dental implant placement with immediate loading on four implants for mandibular-full-arch rehabilitation: a retrospective analysis. Mozzati M; Arata V; Gallesio G; Mussano F; Carossa S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):332-40. PubMed ID: 22236085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. Paolantonio M; Dolci M; Scarano A; d'Archivio D; di Placido G; Tumini V; Piattelli A J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1560-71. PubMed ID: 11759868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of full-arch immediately restored implant-supported reconstructions in extraction and healed sites: a 36-month retrospective evaluation. Artzi Z; Kohen J; Carmeli G; Karmon B; Lor A; Ormianer Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 20369092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets. Gökçen-Röhlig B; Meriç U; Keskin H Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):e1-7. PubMed ID: 20303040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study. Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry. Matarasso S; Salvi GE; Iorio Siciliano V; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 19719737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental implants placed in extraction sites grafted with different bone substitutes: radiographic evaluation at 24 months. Crespi R; Capparè P; Gherlone E J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1616-21. PubMed ID: 19792851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single post-extractive ultra-wide 7 mm-diameter implants versus implants placed in molar healed sites after socket preservation for molar replacement: 6-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial. Tallarico M; Xhanari E; Pisano M; De Riu G; Tullio A; Meloni SM Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(3):263-275. PubMed ID: 27722224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]