These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2246401)

  • 1. Teaching recognition skills to improve products.
    Knight GW; Guenzel PJ; Fitzgerald M
    J Dent Educ; 1990 Dec; 54(12):739-42. PubMed ID: 2246401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuous knowledge of results and psychomotor skill acquisition.
    Feil PH; Reed T; Hart JK
    J Dent Educ; 1986 Jun; 50(6):300-3. PubMed ID: 3458768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of differences in amalgam restorations on examination standardization.
    Cobb DS
    J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):938-40. PubMed ID: 9457136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Criterion-oriented grading system for preclinical operative dentistry laboratory course.
    Dhuru VB; Rypel TS; Johnston WM
    J Dent Educ; 1978 Sep; 42(9):528-31. PubMed ID: 280591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Student and faculty perceptions in the assessment of amalgam restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2000; 80(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 11324025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted.
    Jasinevicius TR; Landers M; Nelson S; Urbankova A
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 68(11):1151-62. PubMed ID: 15520234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of preclinical operative dentistry performance in two instructional methods.
    Boyd MA; Wood WW; Conry RF
    J Dent Educ; 1980 Jun; 44(6):328-31. PubMed ID: 6929307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental students' ability to assess their performance in a preclinical restorative course: comparison of students' and faculty members' assessments.
    Tuncer D; Arhun N; Yamanel K; Çelik Ç; Dayangaç B
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26034030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of student feedback on ePortfolio learning.
    Gardner KM; Aleksejuniene J
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1324-32. PubMed ID: 18981211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an audience response system in a preclinical operative dentistry course.
    Elashvili A; Denehy GE; Dawson DV; Cunningham MA
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1296-303. PubMed ID: 18981208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
    Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert performance on a virtual reality simulation system.
    Wierinck ER; Puttemans V; Swinnen SP; van Steenberghe D
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Jun; 71(6):759-66. PubMed ID: 17554093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry.
    Lilley JD; ten Bruggen Cate HJ; Holloway PJ; Holt JK; Start KB
    Br Dent J; 1968 Sep; 125(5):194-7. PubMed ID: 5244088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of magnification on student performance in pediatric operative dentistry.
    Donaldson ME; Knight GW; Guenzel PJ
    J Dent Educ; 1998 Nov; 62(11):905-10. PubMed ID: 9893687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Technique-Specific Operative Videos on First-Year Dental Students' Performance of Restorative Procedures.
    Patel SA; Barros JA; Clark CM; Frey GN; Streckfus CF; Quock RL
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 26329035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of a leadup activity on performance in an operative preclinic laboratory course.
    Feil PH; Reed TR
    J Dent Educ; 1989 Oct; 53(10):565-8. PubMed ID: 2794190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can evaluation of a dental procedure at the outset of learning predict later performance at the preclinical level? A pilot study.
    Polyzois I; Claffey N; McDonald A; Hussey D; Quinn F
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 May; 15(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 21492346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.