237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22464083)
1. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers.
Shi W; Xue X; Zhang S; Zhao W; Liu S; Zhou H; Wang M; Shi J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jun; 97(6):1338-42. PubMed ID: 22464083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study.
Rama Raju GA; Jaya Prakash G; Murali Krishna K; Madan K
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 18692781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer.
Kato O; Kawasaki N; Bodri D; Kuroda T; Kawachiya S; Kato K; Takehara Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22200255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer.
Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study.
Takahashi K; Mukaida T; Goto T; Oka C
Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 16009162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
Kahraman S; Candan ZN
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
Cobo A; de los Santos MJ; Castellò D; Gámiz P; Campos P; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis.
Ozgur K; Berkkanoglu M; Bulut H; Humaidan P; Coetzee K
Fertil Steril; 2015 Oct; 104(4):899-907.e3. PubMed ID: 26211882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.
De Vos A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29206936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fertility and neonatal outcomes of embryos achieving blastulation on Day 7: are they of clinical value?
Du T; Wang Y; Fan Y; Zhang S; Yan Z; Yu W; Xi Q; Chen Q; Mol BW; Lyu Q; Kuang Y
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1038-1051. PubMed ID: 29669005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of babies born from vitrified oocytes.
Cobo A; Serra V; Garrido N; Olmo I; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1006-1015.e4. PubMed ID: 25064408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts.
Wikland M; Hardarson T; Hillensjö T; Westin C; Westlander G; Wood M; Wennerholm UB
Hum Reprod; 2010 Jul; 25(7):1699-707. PubMed ID: 20472913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.
Wang XL; Zhang X; Qin YQ; Hao DY; Shi HR
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2012 Sep; 29(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 22684538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blastocyst transfer after aseptic vitrification of zygotes: an approach to overcome an impaired uterine environment.
Vanderzwalmen P; Zech NH; Ectors F; Stecher A; Lejeune B; Vanderzwalmen S; Wirleitner B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(6):591-9. PubMed ID: 23069744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of the type of embryo culture medium on neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer in IVF.
Vergouw CG; Kostelijk EH; Doejaaren E; Hompes PG; Lambalk CB; Schats R
Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2619-26. PubMed ID: 22791752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes: double vitrification has no impact on delivery rates.
Cobo A; Castellò D; Vallejo B; Albert C; de los Santos JM; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1623-30. PubMed ID: 23415972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
