180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22464527)
1. Efficacy of identifying maxillofacial lesions in cone-beam computed tomographs by orthodontists and orthodontic residents with third-party software.
Ahmed F; Brooks SL; Kapila SD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 22464527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement among orthodontists experienced with cone-beam computed tomography on the need for follow-up and the clinical impact of craniofacial findings from multiplanar and 3-dimensional reconstructed views.
Edwards R; Alsufyani N; Heo G; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 26232835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography use in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada.
Smith BR; Park JH; Cederberg RA
J Dent Educ; 2011 Jan; 75(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 21205734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidental findings of skull-base abnormalities in cone-beam computed tomography scans with consultation by maxillofacial radiologists.
Newaz ZA; Barghan S; Katkar RA; Bennett JA; Nair MK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 25533079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidental Findings in Small Field of View Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Oser DG; Henson BR; Shiang EY; Finkelman MD; Amato RB
J Endod; 2017 Jun; 43(6):901-904. PubMed ID: 28359665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The frequency and nature of incidental findings in large-field cone beam computed tomography scans of an orthodontic sample.
Edwards R; Alsufyani N; Heo G; Flores-Mir C
Prog Orthod; 2014 Jun; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 25033888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients.
Drage N; Rogers S; Greenall C; Playle R
J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23524545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomography education and exposure in oral and maxillofacial surgery training programs in the United States.
Whitesides LM; Aslam-Pervez N; Warburton G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 73(3):522-8. PubMed ID: 25544299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging.
Cha JY; Mah J; Sinclair P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 17628245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone beam computed tomography utilization by graduates from two orthodontic programs in the Pacific Coast region.
Rajadhyksha S; Nelson G; Oberoi S
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2014 Mar; 42(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 25080723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of dental students, orthodontic residents, and orthodontists for classification of midpalatal suture maturation stages on cone-beam computed tomography scans - a preliminary study.
Chhatwani S; Arman A; Möhlhenrich SC; Ludwig B; Jackowski J; Danesh G
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):373. PubMed ID: 38519965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can cone-beam computed tomography superimposition help orthodontists better understand relapse in surgical patients?
Porciúncula GM; Koerich L; Eidson L; Gandini Junior LG; Gonçalves JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):641-54. PubMed ID: 25439215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of bracket positioning in the indirect bonding technique.
Nichols DA; Gardner G; Carballeyra AD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):770-6. PubMed ID: 24182593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three dimensional computed technology--a new standard of care.
Tipton WL; Metz P
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2008; 19(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 18512657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of airway volume changes between open and closed jaw positions.
Glupker L; Kula K; Parks E; Babler W; Stewart K; Ghoneima A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 25836002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Image Interpretation by Endodontists and Endodontic Residents.
Beacham JT; Geist JR; Yu Q; Himel VT; Sabey KA
J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):571-575. PubMed ID: 29397216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF RESIDENTS' PERCEPTION OF THEIR TRAINING AND KNOWLEDGE ON THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGING.
Deçolli Y; Haba D; Petcu AE; Balan A; Zetu IN; Duma OO
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2015; 119(2):544-8. PubMed ID: 26204665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study.
Price JB; Thaw KL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Padilla RJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 22092929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics.
Nervina JM
Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():95-102. PubMed ID: 22376101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalometric landmark identification consistency between undergraduate dental students and orthodontic residents in 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomography images: A preliminary study.
Míguez-Contreras M; Jiménez-Trujillo I; Romero-Maroto M; López-de-Andrés A; Lagravère MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28024771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
