217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22464530)
1. Relapse of orthodontically corrected deepbites in accordance with growth pattern.
Pollard D; Akyalcin S; Wiltshire WA; Rody WJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 22464530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overjet, overbite, and anterior crowding relapses in extraction and nonextraction patients, and their correlations.
Francisconi MF; Janson G; Freitas KM; Oliveira RC; Oliveira RC; Freitas MR; Henriques JF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 24975000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A long-term assessment of the mechanical retroclination of lower incisors.
Mills JR
Angle Orthod; 1967 Jul; 37(3):165-74. PubMed ID: 19919212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Components of overbite correction in lingual orthodontics: molar extrusion or incisor intrusion?
Barthelemi S; Hyppolite MP; Palot C; Wiechmann D
Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):395-412. PubMed ID: 25457390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases.
Ramesh GC; Pradeep MC; Kumar GA; Girish KS; Suresh BS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 23404008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the relevance of "ideal" occlusion concepts for incisor inclination target definition.
Knösel M; Jung K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 22051485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames.
Li JL; Kau C; Wang M
Prog Orthod; 2014 Jun; 15(1):41. PubMed ID: 25033937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cephalometric analysis of the relationship between facial pattern, interincisal angulation and anterior overbite changes.
Ludwig M
Angle Orthod; 1967 Jul; 37(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 19919215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term mandibular skeletal and dental effects of standard edgewise treatment.
Bayirli B; Vaden JL; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 24182584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.
Cacciatore G; Ghislanzoni LT; Alvetro L; Giuntini V; Franchi L
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1010-7. PubMed ID: 24665887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
