These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. An in vitro comparative assessment of different enamel contaminants during bracket bonding. Faltermeier A; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Reicheneder C; Müssig D Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 17873148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Bonding and retention]. Mauchamp OP Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 19552884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Bonding durability of using self-etching primer with 4-META/ MMA-TBB resin cement to bond orthodontic brackets. Saito K; Sirirungrojying S; Meguro D; Hayakawa T; Kasai K Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15825793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Indirect bonding technique in lingual orthodontics: the HIRO system. Hiro T; Iglesia Fd; Andreu P Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):34-45. PubMed ID: 19350057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing bond strengths of brackets on primary teeth with 3 different primers. Ozoe-Ishida R; Endo T; Shimooka S Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 20483014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Zheng L; Pereira PN; Nakajima M; Sano H; Tagami J Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 11203783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances bonded with different etching techniques on tooth color: a prospective clinical study. Al Maaitah EF; Abu Omar AA; Al-Khateeb SN Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23810044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the Accuracy of Indirect Bonding with 3D Scanning Technology. El Nigoumi A J Clin Orthod; 2016 Oct; 50(10):613-619. PubMed ID: 27888654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of a new curing light on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 12940564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of modifying the adhesive composition on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Laffoon J; Warren J Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):464-7. PubMed ID: 12401056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A clinical comparison of bracket bond failures in association with direct and indirect bonding. Thiyagarajah S; Spary DJ; Rock WP J Orthod; 2006 Sep; 33(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 16926313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The direct way of indirect bonding--the combined effect. Gayake PV; Chitko SS; Sutrave N; Gaikwad PM Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 24358650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of adhesives with various degrees of hydrophilicity on resin ceramic bond durability. El Zohairy AA; De Gee AJ; Hassan FM; Feilzer AJ Dent Mater; 2004 Oct; 20(8):778-87. PubMed ID: 15302458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Kaaden C; Powers JM; Friedl KH; Schmalz G Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12271348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Enamel bond strengths of "one-bottle" adhesives. Swift EJ; Perdigão J; Heymann HO Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9783296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An update on the indirect-bonding technique (non-custom base). Mahony D J Gen Orthod; 1999; 10(3):7-14. PubMed ID: 10806949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]