These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents. Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of cytotoxicity between chemical retraction agents on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro]. Liu J; Zhang XM; Hao PJ; Hui M; Yu HY Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 27(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 19472890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents. Bowles WH; Tardy SJ; Vahadi A J Dent Res; 1991 Nov; 70(11):1447-9. PubMed ID: 1960257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents. Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Viability of fibroblasts in cell culture after treatment with different chemical retraction agents. Kopac I; Batista U; Cvetko E; Marion L J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 11844038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The rabbit gingival tissue response to retraction liquids and tetrahydrozoline. Kostić I; Mihailović D; Najman S; Stojanović S; Kostić M Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 24516990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological Response Induced in Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts upon Exposure to Various Types of Injectable Astringent Retraction Agents. Nowakowska D; Kulbacka J; Wezgowiec J; Szewczyk A; Baczynska D; Zietek M; Wieckiewicz W; Saczko J Materials (Basel); 2021 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 33924145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytotoxic Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on Human Gingival Fibroblasts In Vitro. Furukawa M; K-Kaneyama JR; Yamada M; Senda A; Manabe A; Miyazaki A Oper Dent; 2015; 40(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 25575199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin. Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of dental gel formulation on human primary fibroblasts - an in vitro study. Sterczala B; Kulbacka J; Saczko J; Dominiak M Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2020; 58(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 32567043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytotoxic effects of dental desensitizers on human gingival fibroblasts. Sengun A; Buyukbas S; Hakki SS J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Jul; 78(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 16470823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow. Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gingival retraction. Carville R J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015 Dec; 61(6):298-300. PubMed ID: 26902073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of HEMA on type I collagen protein in human gingival fibroblasts. Falconi M; Teti G; Zago M; Pelotti S; Breschi L; Mazzotti G Cell Biol Toxicol; 2007 Sep; 23(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 17486417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]