BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22465079)

  • 1. Imaging the femoral cortex: thickness, density and mass from clinical CT.
    Treece GM; Poole KE; Gee AH
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):952-65. PubMed ID: 22465079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data.
    Treece GM; Gee AH; Mayhew PM; Poole KE
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Jun; 14(3):276-90. PubMed ID: 20163980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the bone endocortical region using clinical CT.
    Pearson RA; Treece GM
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Feb; 44():28-40. PubMed ID: 29179157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Independent measurement of femoral cortical thickness and cortical bone density using clinical CT.
    Treece GM; Gee AH
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Feb; 20(1):249-64. PubMed ID: 25541355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical Note: Cortical thickness and density estimation from clinical CT using a prior thickness-density relationship.
    Humbert L; Hazrati Marangalou J; Del Río Barquero LM; van Lenthe GH; van Rietbergen B
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1945. PubMed ID: 27036590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone turnover markers are associated with higher cortical porosity, thinner cortices, and larger size of the proximal femur and non-vertebral fractures.
    Shigdel R; Osima M; Ahmed LA; Joakimsen RM; Eriksen EF; Zebaze R; Bjørnerem Å
    Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():1-6. PubMed ID: 26112819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR; Shin Y; Agrawal P; Elhabian SY; Whitaker RT; Weiss JA; Aoki SK; Peters CL; Anderson AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical and Trabecular Bone Analysis of Patients With High Bone Mass From the Barcelona Osteoporosis Cohort Using 3-Dimensional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry: A Case-Control Study.
    Orduna G; Humbert L; Fonolla R; Romera J; Cos ML; Rial A; Nogués X; Diez-Perez A; Mellibovsky L
    J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):480-484. PubMed ID: 28648836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric mapping and quantitative analysis of the human calvarium.
    Voie A; Dirnbacher M; Fisher D; Hölscher T
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Dec; 38(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 25069430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hierarchical 3D segmentation method and the definition of vertebral body coordinate systems for QCT of the lumbar spine.
    Mastmeyer A; Engelke K; Fuchs C; Kalender WA
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Aug; 10(4):560-77. PubMed ID: 16828329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method for cortical bone structural analysis from magnetic resonance images.
    Gomberg BR; Saha PK; Wehrli FW
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1320-32. PubMed ID: 16179209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated measurement of pediatric cranial bone thickness and density from clinical computed tomography.
    Smith K; Politte D; Reiker G; Nolan TS; Hildebolt C; Mattson C; Tucker D; Prior F; Turovets S; Larson-Prior LJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4462-5. PubMed ID: 23366918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between femur size and a focal defect of the superior femoral neck.
    Gee AH; Treece GM; Tonkin CJ; Black DM; Poole KES
    Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():60-66. PubMed ID: 26142930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
    Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
    J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A local adaptive threshold strategy for high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone.
    Burghardt AJ; Kazakia GJ; Majumdar S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1678-86. PubMed ID: 17602299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevance of 2D radiographic texture analysis for the assessment of 3D bone micro-architecture.
    Apostol L; Boudousq V; Basset O; Odet C; Yot S; Tabary J; Dinten JM; Boiler E; Kotzki PO; Peyrin F
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3546-56. PubMed ID: 17022251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accurate measurement of bone mineral density using clinical CT imaging with single energy beam spectral intensity correction.
    Zhang J; Yan CH; Chui CK; Ong SH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1382-9. PubMed ID: 20236874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subchondral bone density distribution in the human femoral head.
    Wright DA; Meguid M; Lubovsky O; Whyne CM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2012 Jun; 41(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 22057580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CTXA hip: the effect of partial volume correction on volumetric bone mineral density data for cortical and trabecular bone.
    Liu Y; Wang L; Su Y; Brown K; Yang R; Zhang Y; Duanmu Y; Guo Z; Zhang W; Yan C; Yan D; Cheng X
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Mar; 15(1):50. PubMed ID: 32193671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.