These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22465170)

  • 1. Odor-avoidance or odor-preference induced by amphetamine in the infant rat depending on the dose and testing modality.
    Revillo DA; Fernandez G; Castello S; Paglini MG; Arias C
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 May; 231(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 22465170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to LiCl- and amphetamine-induced taste avoidance in preweanling rats.
    Revillo DA; Spear NE; Arias C
    Chem Senses; 2011 Jul; 36(6):565-77. PubMed ID: 21444932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-examination of amphetamine-induced conditioned suppression of tastant intake in rats: the task-dependent drug effects hypothesis.
    Huang AC; Hsiao S
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 122(6):1207-16. PubMed ID: 19045940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruption of latent inhibition to a contextual stimulus with systemic amphetamine.
    Norman C; Cassaday HJ
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 Jul; 82(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15183172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose-dependent aversive and rewarding effects of amphetamine as revealed by a new place conditioning apparatus.
    Cabib S; Puglisi-Allegra S; Genua C; Simon H; Le Moal M; Piazza PV
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1996 May; 125(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 8724454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Appetitive sensitization by amphetamine does not reduce its ability to produce conditioned taste aversion to saccharin.
    Scott-Railton J; Arnold G; Vezina P
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 175(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 17023060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced place preference is predicted by locomotor response to novelty and amphetamine in the mouse.
    Orsini C; Buchini F; Piazza PV; Puglisi-Allegra S; Cabib S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Mar; 172(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 14600800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Involvement of Glutamate NMDA Receptors in the Acute, Long-Term, and Conditioned Effects of Amphetamine on Rat 50 kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations.
    Costa G; Morelli M; Simola N
    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2015 May; 18(11):pyv057. PubMed ID: 25991653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amphetamine selectively enhances avoidance responding to a less salient stimulus in rats.
    Li M; He W; Munro R
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2008 May; 115(5):773-6. PubMed ID: 18188497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expression of the CS- and US-pre-exposure effects in the conditioned taste aversion paradigm and their abolition following systemic amphetamine treatment in C57BL6/J mice.
    Meyer U; Chang DL; Feldon J; Yee BK
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2004 Dec; 29(12):2140-8. PubMed ID: 15238994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-training amphetamine administration enhances memory consolidation in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: Implications for drug addiction.
    Simon NW; Setlow B
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2006 Nov; 86(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 16750404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The GABA-B positive modulator GS39783 decreases psychostimulant conditioned-reinforcement and conditioned-reward.
    Halbout B; Quarta D; Valerio E; Heidbreder CA; Hutcheson DM
    Addict Biol; 2011 Jul; 16(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 21309927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Change in the hedonic value of an aversive stimulus in the presence of a pre-exposed odor.
    Kamenetzky GV; Suárez AB; Pautassi RM; Mustaca AE; Nizhnikov ME
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Sep; 148():51-7. PubMed ID: 25543090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone (α-PVP)-induced taste avoidance, place preference, hyperthermia and locomotor activity in rats.
    Nelson KH; Manke HN; Imanalieva A; Rice KC; Riley AL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2019 Oct; 185():172762. PubMed ID: 31445057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The enigma of conditioned taste aversion learning: stimulus properties of 2-phenylethylamine derivatives.
    Greenshaw AJ; Turrkish S; Davis BA
    Physiol Res; 2002; 51 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 12479782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
    Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amphetamine and morphine produce a conditioned taste and place preference in the house musk shrew (Suncus murinus).
    Parker LA; Corrick ML; Limebeer CL; Kwiatkowska M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Jan; 28(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 11868236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signaling the unconditioned stimulus during the preexposure phase does not attenuate the unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect in preweanling rats.
    Castello S; Bobbio A; Orellana E; Arias C
    Dev Psychobiol; 2012 Dec; 54(8):808-17. PubMed ID: 22213476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity.
    Horsley RR; Cassaday HJ
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2008 May; 32(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 18406505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disruption of the US pre-exposure effect and latent inhibition in two-way active avoidance by systemic amphetamine in C57BL/6 mice.
    Chang T; Meyer U; Feldon J; Yee BK
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Apr; 191(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17180617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.