These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22467354)

  • 21. The effects of acute stress and perceptual load on distractor interference.
    Sato H; Takenaka I; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 22463388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
    He C; Chen A
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Practice in visual search produces decreased capacity demands but increased distraction.
    Wilson DE; MacLeod CM; Muroi M
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Aug; 70(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 18717397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Classic debates in selective attention: early vs late, perceptual load vs dilution, mean RT vs measures of capacity.
    Nelson MD; Crisostomo M; Khericha A; Russo F; Thorne GL
    Perception; 2012; 41(8):997-1000. PubMed ID: 23362678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():326. PubMed ID: 23801969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual working-memory capacity load does not modulate distractor processing.
    Yao N; Guo Y; Liu Y; Shen M; Gao Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3291-3313. PubMed ID: 32529572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):576-9. PubMed ID: 22390296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High perceptual load makes everybody equal: eliminating individual differences in distractibility with load.
    Forster S; Lavie N
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 17576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.
    Scalf PE; Torralbo A; Tapia E; Beck DM
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():243. PubMed ID: 23717289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.
    Lavie N; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 11595091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic imitation? Imitative compatibility affects responses at high perceptual load.
    Catmur C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 26569336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.
    Lavie N; Hirst A; de Fockert JW; Viding E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15355143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual load corresponds with factors known to influence visual search.
    Roper ZJ; Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 23398258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference.
    Chen Z
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):888-900. PubMed ID: 14528898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.