99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2246766)
1. Aggressive evaluation for atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Lindheim SR; Smith-Nguyen G
J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):971-3. PubMed ID: 2246766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human papillomavirus screening for women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
Borst M; Butterworth CE; Baker V; Kuykendall K; Gore H; Soong SJ; Hatch KD
J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 1849177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical squamous cells. A case-series study of the association between papanicolaou smear results and human papillomavirus DNA genotype.
Rader JS; Rosenzweig BA; Spirtas R; Padleckas R; Javaheri G; Gerardo L; Laimins LA
J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 1649307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
Kohan S; Noumoff J; Beckman EM; Morris M; Weiner E; Douglas GW
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 4009560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy.
Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Koilocytotic atypia and underlying dysplasia.
Shepherd J; Lynch W
J Fam Pract; 1991 Aug; 33(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 1890397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of atypical cervical cytology in an older population.
Kaminski PF; Sorosky JI; Wheelock JB; Stevens CW
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jan; 73(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 2535763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical smears in assessment of the natural history of human papillomavirus infections in prospectively followed women.
Syrjänen KJ; Mäntyjärvi R; Väyrynen M; Yliskoski M; Syrjänen SM; Saarikoski S; Nurmi T; Parkkinen S; Castrén O
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 2827414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
Andrews S; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):751-3. PubMed ID: 2704502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between cervical cytology and biopsy in an air force colposcopy clinic.
Smith KH; Bostrom SG; Galey WT
J Reprod Med; 1985 Sep; 30(9):681-4. PubMed ID: 4057183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and follow-up of abnormal Pap smears.
Miller KE; Losh DP; Folley A
Am Fam Physician; 1992 Jan; 45(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 1309403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical dyskeratotic cells as predictors of condylomatous changes on biopsy.
Boras VF; Duggan MA
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 2538985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
