These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22468460)

  • 21. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.
    Hicks JL; Uchida TK; Seth A; Rajagopal A; Delp SL
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Feb; 137(2):020905. PubMed ID: 25474098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Advanced modeling environment for developing and testing FES control systems.
    Davoodi R; Brown IE; Loeb GE
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jan; 25(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 12485781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A full body musculoskeletal model based on flexible multibody simulation approach utilised in bone strain analysis during human locomotion.
    Al Nazer R; Klodowski A; Rantalainen T; Heinonen A; Sievänen H; Mikkola A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Jun; 14(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 21302163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Virtual musculo-skeletal model for the biomechanical analysis of the upper limb.
    Pennestrì E; Stefanelli R; Valentini PP; Vita L
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(6):1350-61. PubMed ID: 16824531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Musculoskeletal representation of a large repertoire of hand grasping actions in primates.
    Schaffelhofer S; Sartori M; Scherberger H; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Mar; 23(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 25350935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer simulation of the human leg subjected to impact loading.
    Xishi W; Turgut TS; Nuri A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(6):491-501. PubMed ID: 14702986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle-tendon properties: a Monte-Carlo analysis.
    Ackland DC; Lin YC; Pandy MG
    J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1463-71. PubMed ID: 22507351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of muscle strengthening on vertical jump height: a simulation study.
    Bobbert MF; Van Soest AJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Aug; 26(8):1012-20. PubMed ID: 7968418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Muscle activity and co-contraction of musculoskeletal model during steering maneuver.
    Gao ZH; Fan D; Wang D; Zhao H; Zhao K; Chen C
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2697-706. PubMed ID: 25226974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. I.3. Dynamics of human movement.
    Koopman BH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 152():27-44. PubMed ID: 20407184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of joint models on lower-limb musculo-tendon forces and three-dimensional joint reaction forces during gait.
    Dumas R; Moissenet F; Gasparutto X; Cheze L
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Feb; 226(2):146-60. PubMed ID: 22468466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the use of musculoskeletal models to interpret motor control strategies from performance data.
    Cheng EJ; Loeb GE
    J Neural Eng; 2008 Jun; 5(2):232-53. PubMed ID: 18506076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A general-purpose framework to simulate musculoskeletal system of human body: using a motion tracking approach.
    Ehsani H; Rostami M; Gudarzi M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Feb; 19(3):306-319. PubMed ID: 25761607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are fixed limb inertial models valid for dynamic simulations of human movement?
    Clark T; Hawkins D
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2695-701. PubMed ID: 20673667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical modeling and load-carrying simulation of lower limb exoskeleton.
    Zhu Y; Zhang G; Zhang C; Liu G; Zhao J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S729-38. PubMed ID: 26406068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An optimization-based simultaneous approach to the determination of muscular, ligamentous, and joint contact forces provides insight into musculoligamentous interaction.
    Cleather DJ; Bull AM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1925-34. PubMed ID: 21445690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Force-velocity, force-power relationships of bilateral and unilateral leg multi-joint movements in young and elderly women.
    Yamauchi J; Mishima C; Nakayama S; Ishii N
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2151-7. PubMed ID: 19647259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of bilateral asymmetry of muscle strength on the height of a squat jump: a computer simulation study.
    Yoshioka S; Nagano A; Hay DC; Fukashiro S
    J Sports Sci; 2011 May; 29(8):867-77. PubMed ID: 21506038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robust passive dynamics of the musculoskeletal system compensate for unexpected surface changes during human hopping.
    van der Krogt MM; de Graaf WW; Farley CT; Moritz CT; Richard Casius LJ; Bobbert MF
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Sep; 107(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 19589956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rectus femoris and vastus intermedius fiber excursions predicted by three-dimensional muscle models.
    Blemker SS; Delp SL
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(8):1383-91. PubMed ID: 15972213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.