These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22469338)

  • 21. Tracking case management accountability: a systems approach.
    Frankel AJ; Heft-LaPorte H
    J Case Manag; 1998; 7(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 10703375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Applying complexity theory: a review to inform evaluation design.
    Walton M
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Aug; 45():119-26. PubMed ID: 24780280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Making sense of the emerging conversation in evaluation about systems thinking and complexity science.
    Gates EF
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():62-73. PubMed ID: 27591941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developing interdisciplinary maternity services policy in Canada. Evaluation of a consensus workshop.
    Martin CM; Kasperski J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 16(1):238-45. PubMed ID: 20367842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
    Brousselle A; Champagne F
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Feb; 34(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 20541262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ten steps to making evaluation matter.
    Sridharan S; Nakaima A
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 May; 34(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 20970856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Introduction.
    Baizerman M
    Eval Program Plann; 2012 Feb; 35(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 21367456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gains and losses of structured information collection in the evaluation of 'rehabilitation in the community' programmes: ten lessons learnt during actual evaluations.
    Velema JP; Finkenflügel HJ; Cornielje H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 17852313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assumption-aware tools and agency; an interrogation of the primary artifacts of the program evaluation and design profession in working with complex evaluands and complex contexts.
    Morrow N; Nkwake AM
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():141-153. PubMed ID: 27340048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reflections on conducting evaluations for rural development interventions in China.
    Luo LP; Liu L
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Dec; 47():1-8. PubMed ID: 25045841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An assessment of goal-free evaluation: case studies of four goal-free evaluations.
    Youker BW; Ingraham A; Bayer N
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Oct; 46():10-6. PubMed ID: 24863956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Theory underlying a national teacher evaluation program.
    Taut S; Santelices V; Araya C; Manzi J
    Eval Program Plann; 2010 Nov; 33(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 20163858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation.
    Tolson D; McIntosh J; Loftus L; Cormie P
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Feb; 44(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 16423354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conclusion: Agency in the face of complexity and the future of assumption-aware evaluation practice.
    Morrow N; Nkwake AM
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():154-160. PubMed ID: 27423925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Willingness to pay in the context of an economic evaluation of healthcare programs: theory and practice.
    Gafni A
    Am J Manag Care; 1997 May; 3 Suppl():S21-32. PubMed ID: 10180338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using logic models to facilitate comparisons of evaluation theory.
    Alkin MC; Vo AT; Hansen M
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():33. PubMed ID: 22480564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a planning and evaluation methodology for assessing the contribution of theory to a diabetes prevention lifestyle intervention.
    Helitzer D; Peterson AB; Thompson J; Fluder S
    Health Promot Pract; 2008 Oct; 9(4):404-14. PubMed ID: 16861598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis.
    Chen HT
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():109-118. PubMed ID: 27346429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clarifying concepts and categories of assumptions for use in evaluation.
    Nkwake AM; Morrow N
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():97-101. PubMed ID: 27324287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring stakeholder participation in evaluation: an empirical validation of the Participatory Evaluation Measurement Instrument (PEMI).
    Daigneault PM; Jacob S; Tremblay J
    Eval Rev; 2012 Aug; 36(4):243-71. PubMed ID: 23036911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.