247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22469377)
1. Application of the RADPEER™ scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists.
Maloney E; Lomasney LM; Schomer L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Apr; 9(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 22469377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty.
Ruma J; Klein KA; Chong S; Wesolowski J; Kazerooni EA; Ellis JH; Myles JD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 21636055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.
Ruutiainen AT; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Sep; 8(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 21889753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy.
Weinberg BD; Richter MD; Champine JG; Morriss MC; Browning T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jan; 12(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 25557573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the Radpeer system.
Bender LC; Linnau KF; Meier EN; Anzai Y; Gunn ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1320-7. PubMed ID: 23169725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.
Ruutiainen AT; Durand DJ; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23452475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Concordance" Revisited: A Multispecialty Appraisal of "Concordant" Preliminary Abdominopelvic CT Reports.
Brown JM; Dickerson EC; Rabinowitz LC; Cohan RH; Ellis JH; Litell JM; Kaza RK; Lopez AN; Theyyunni NR; Weber JT; Kocher KE; Davenport MS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 27338216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.
Issa G; Taslakian B; Itani M; Hitti E; Batley N; Saliba M; El-Merhi F
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 24833644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Chung JH; Strigel RM; Chew AR; Albrecht E; Gunn ML
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19481962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of discrepancy rates in resident and faculty interpretations of on-call PE CT and V/Q scans: is one study more reliable during off hours?
Xiong L; Trout AT; Bailey JE; Brown RK; Kelly AM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 21636056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. RADPEER scoring white paper.
Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overnight radiology resident discrepancies at a large pediatric hospital: categorization by year of training, program, imaging modality, and report type.
Dinh ML; Yazdani R; Godiyal N; Pfeifer CM
Acta Radiol; 2022 Jan; 63(1):122-126. PubMed ID: 33406888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary reports in the emergency department: is a subspecialist radiologist more accurate than a radiology resident?
Branstetter BF; Morgan MB; Nesbit CE; Phillips JA; Lionetti DM; Chang PJ; Towers JD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 17236993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What factors affect the discrepancy rate between preliminary resident interpretations of neuroimaging studies and the final attending interpretation?
Chan S
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 18572115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting attending agreement with resident early readings of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head, neck, and spine.
Sistrom C; Deitte L
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):934-41. PubMed ID: 18572131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On-Call Radiology Resident Discrepancies: Categorization by Patient Location and Severity.
Mellnick V; Raptis C; McWilliams S; Picus D; Wahl R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27319372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
