197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22471553)
1. Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections among high-risk neutropenic patients in Spain.
Grau S; de la Cámara R; Sabater FJ; Jarque I; Carreras E; Casado MA; Sanz MA
BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Apr; 12():83. PubMed ID: 22471553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of posaconazole vs. standard azole prophylaxis in high risk neutropenic patients in the Netherlands.
Stam WB; O'Sullivan AK; Rijnders B; Lugtenburg E; Span LF; Janssen JJ; Jansen JP
Eur J Haematol; 2008 Dec; 81(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 18754857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infection in high-risk neutropenic patients in Sweden.
Lundberg J; Höglund M; Björkholm M; Åkerborg Ö
Clin Drug Investig; 2014 Jul; 34(7):483-9. PubMed ID: 24820968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections among neutropenic patients in the United States.
O'Sullivan AK; Pandya A; Papadopoulos G; Thompson D; Langston A; Perfect J; Weinstein MC
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):666-73. PubMed ID: 19508661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Economic evaluation of posaconazole in prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in Italian neutropenic patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome].
Lazzaro C
Infez Med; 2010 Jun; 18(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 20610931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cost effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole/itraconazole in the prophylactic treatment of invasive fungal infections in Mexico].
Rely K; Alexandre PK; Escudero GS
Value Health; 2011; 14(5 Suppl 1):S39-42. PubMed ID: 21839897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posaconazole vs fluconazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal diseases in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis in an Asian teaching hospital.
Chan TS; Marcella SW; Gill H; Hwang YY; Kwong YL
J Med Econ; 2016; 19(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 26366612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole Tablets for Invasive Fungal Infections Prevention in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients in Spain.
Cámara R; Gozalbo I; Jurado M; Sanz J; Aragón B; Grau S
Adv Ther; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2104-2119. PubMed ID: 28808915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Posaconazole vs fluconazole/itraconazole in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Greece.
Athanasakis K; Petrakis I; Kyriopoulos J
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(5):678-84. PubMed ID: 23448409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An update to the cost-effectiveness of posaconazole vs fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal disease among neutropenic patients in the United States.
Sung AH; Marcella SW; Xie Y
J Med Econ; 2015 May; 18(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 25524741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole versus itraconazole in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Sánchez-Ortega I; Patiño B; Muñoz C; Arnan M; Peralta T; Clopés A; de Sevilla AF; Duarte RF
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(6):736-43. PubMed ID: 23541251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adapting a global cost-effectiveness model to local country requirements: posaconazole case study.
Papadopoulos G; Hunt S; Prasad M
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 23256900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing intensive cytotoxic therapy for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia: a cost effectiveness analysis.
Dranitsaris G; Khoury H
Support Care Cancer; 2011 Nov; 19(11):1807-13. PubMed ID: 20972589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-benefit Analysis of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole or Itraconazole as a Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in High-risk Hematologic Patients: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
Cho SY; Lee DG; Choi JK; Lee HJ; Kim SH; Park SH; Choi SM; Choi JH; Yoo JH; Kim YJ; Kim HJ; Min WS; Back H; Kang S; Lee EK
Clin Ther; 2015 Sep; 37(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 26188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with prolonged neutropenia.
Collins CD; Ellis JJ; Kaul DR
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2008 Dec; 65(23):2237-43. PubMed ID: 19020192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infections in U.S. patients with graft-versus-host disease.
O'Sullivan AK; Weinstein MC; Pandya A; Thompson D; Langston AA; Perfect JR; Papadopoulos G
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2012 Jan; 69(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 22215361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole compared with standard azole therapy for prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients at high risk in Switzerland.
Greiner RA; Meier Y; Papadopoulos G; O'Sullivan AK; Imhof A
Oncology; 2010; 78(3-4):172-80. PubMed ID: 20414005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis.
Zhao YJ; Khoo AL; Tan G; Teng M; Tee C; Tan BH; Ong B; Lim BP; Chai LY
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2016 Jan; 60(1):376-86. PubMed ID: 26525782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic evaluation of posaconazole vs fluconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients with GVHD following haematopoietic SCT.
de la Cámara R; Jarque I; Sanz MA; Grau S; Casado MA; Sabater FJ; Carreras E
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2010 May; 45(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 19802030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Posaconazole: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease in immunocompromised hosts.
Lyseng-Williamson KA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Mar; 29(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 21309616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
