These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22471687)

  • 1. Participation in population-based case-control studies: does the observed decline vary by socio-economic status?
    Mazloum M; Bailey HD; Heiden T; Armstrong BK; de Klerk N; Milne E
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 May; 26(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 22471687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representativeness of child controls recruited by random digit dialling.
    Bailey HD; Milne E; de Klerk N; Fritschi L; Bower C; Attia J; Armstrong BK
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2010 May; 24(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 20415759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of racial differences in childhood cancer risk in case-control studies and population-based cancer registries.
    Slusky DA; Mezei G; Metayer C; Selvin S; Von Behren J; Buffler PA
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 22018954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health inequalities across socio-economic groups: comparing geographic-area-based and individual-based indicators.
    Walker AE; Becker NG
    Public Health; 2005 Dec; 119(12):1097-104. PubMed ID: 16183087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case control study on childhood leukemia in Lower Saxony, Germany. Basic considerations, methodology, and summary of results.
    Kaatsch P; Kaletsch U; Krummenauer F; Meinert R; Miesner A; Haaf G; Michaelis J
    Klin Padiatr; 1996; 208(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 8776704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement in measuring socio-economic status: area-based versus individual measures.
    Demissie K; Hanley JA; Menzies D; Joseph L; Ernst P
    Chronic Dis Can; 2000; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10813687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Socioeconomic status and childhood leukaemia: a review.
    Poole C; Greenland S; Luetters C; Kelsey JL; Mezei G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 35(2):370-84. PubMed ID: 16308412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Socioeconomic factors influence selection and participation in a population-based case-control study of head and neck cancer in Scotland.
    Conway DI; McMahon AD; Smith K; Taylor JC; McKinney PA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18619798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Area-based socioeconomic status and mood disorders: cross-sectional evidence from a cohort of randomly selected adult women.
    Williams LJ; Brennan SL; Henry MJ; Berk M; Jacka FN; Nicholson GC; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Maturitas; 2011 Jun; 69(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 21514078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-participation and adjustment for bias in case-control studies of periodontitis.
    López R; Frydenberg M; Baelum V
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Oct; 116(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 18821981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upstairs and downstairs: socio-economic and gender interactions in herpes simplex virus type 2 seroprevalence in australia.
    Page A; Taylor R; Richters J; Shaw J; Taylor J; Cunningham A; Mindel A
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jun; 36(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 19556928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case-control study on risk factors for leukaemia and brain tumours in children under 5 years in Germany.
    Spix C; Schulze-Rath R; Kaatsch P; Blettner M
    Klin Padiatr; 2009; 221(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 19890788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.
    Trauth JM; Musa D; Siminoff L; Jewell IK; Ricci E
    J Health Soc Policy; 2000; 12(2):23-43. PubMed ID: 11184441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Socioeconomic status and risk of childhood leukaemia in Denmark.
    Raaschou-Nielsen O; Obel J; Dalton S; TjØnneland A; Hansen J
    Scand J Public Health; 2004; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15370768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survey error in measuring socio-economic risk factors of health status: a comparison of a survey and a census.
    Lorant V; Demarest S; Miermans PJ; Van Oyen H
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 36(6):1292-9. PubMed ID: 17898025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of socio-economic factors on functional status decline among community-dwelling older adults in China.
    Beydoun MA; Popkin BM
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 May; 60(9):2045-57. PubMed ID: 15743653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychosocial correlates of leisure-time walking among Australian adults of lower and higher socio-economic status.
    Janssen E; Sugiyama T; Winkler E; de Vries H; te Poel F; Owen N
    Health Educ Res; 2010 Apr; 25(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 19307317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: evidence for selective study participation and selection bias.
    Kramer MS; Wilkins R; Goulet L; Séguin L; Lydon J; Kahn SR; McNamara H; Dassa C; Dahhou M; Masse A; Miner L; Asselin G; Gauthier H; Ghanem A; Benjamin A; Platt RW;
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 23(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 19523077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of selection bias in the Canadian case-control study of residential magnetic field exposure and childhood leukemia.
    Mezei G; Spinelli JJ; Wong P; Borugian M; McBride ML
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 167(12):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18483123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors.
    Cerin E; Leslie E; Owen N
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Mar; 68(6):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19193480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.