394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22471790)
1. Peri-implant bone formation and surface characteristics of rough surface zirconia implants manufactured by powder injection molding technique in rabbit tibiae.
Park YS; Chung SH; Shon WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):586-91. PubMed ID: 22471790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of peri-implant bone formation around injection-molded and machined surface zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae.
Kim HK; Woo KM; Shon WJ; Ahn JS; Cha S; Park YS
Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(4):508-15. PubMed ID: 26235717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peri-implant bone formations around (Ti,Zr)O(2) -coated zirconia implants with different surface roughness.
Chung SH; Kim HK; Shon WJ; Park YS
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Apr; 40(4):404-11. PubMed ID: 23425208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peri-implant bone formation of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma-treated zirconia implants with different surface roughness in rabbit tibiae.
Shon WJ; Chung SH; Kim HK; Han GJ; Cho BH; Park YS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23406227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit.
Sennerby L; Dasmah A; Larsson B; Iverhed M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 16137083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-dependent periimplant bone reaction of acidic monomer-treated injection molded zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae.
Shon WJ; Woo KM; Kim HK; Kwon HB; Shin SY; Park YS
Implant Dent; 2015 Jun; 24(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 25902367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation.
Guo Z; Zhou L; Rong M; Zhu A; Geng H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 20209195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique.
Aboushelib MN; Salem NA; Taleb AL; El Moniem NM
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 21905894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Suh JY; Jeung OC; Choi BJ; Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 17298490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits.
Rocchietta I; Fontana F; Addis A; Schupbach P; Simion M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 19604281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat.
Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Hinze M; Han JS; Bächle M; Butz F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
