These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22472095)

  • 1. Interpretation of the peak areas in gamma-ray spectra that have a large relative uncertainty.
    Korun M; Maver Modec P; Vodenik B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Jun; 70(6):999-1004. PubMed ID: 22472095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical analysis of uncertainties of gamma-peak identification and area calculation in particulate air-filter environment radionuclide measurements using the results of a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) organized intercomparison, Part I: assessment of reliability and uncertainties of isotope detection and energy precision using artificial spiked test spectra, Part II: assessment of the true type I error rate and the quality of peak area estimators in relation to type II errors using large numbers of natural spectra.
    Zhang W; Zähringer M; Ungar K; Hoffman I
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1695-701. PubMed ID: 18515125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of the peak-analysis results in gamma-ray spectrometry for high relative peak-area uncertainties.
    Korun M; Vodenik B; Zorko B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Nov; 105():60-65. PubMed ID: 26248084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correction methodology for the spectral interfering γ-rays overlapping to the analytical peaks used in the analysis of 232Th.
    Yücel H; Köse E; Esen AN; Bor D
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2011 Jun; 69(6):890-7. PubMed ID: 21398134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the background approximation methods on the analysis of gamma-ray spectra.
    Luca A; Morel J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004; 60(2-4):233-7. PubMed ID: 14987649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cascade summing effects in close geometry gamma-ray spectrometry.
    Johnston PN; Hult M; Gasparro J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1323-8. PubMed ID: 16580218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semi-empirical modeling of gamma-ray density logs with the possibility of obtaining more information.
    Li F; Gardner RP
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):936-40. PubMed ID: 19926485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral interference corrections for the measurement of (238)U in materials rich in thorium by a high resolution gamma-ray spectrometry.
    Yücel H; Solmaz AN; Köse E; Bor D
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2049-56. PubMed ID: 19683454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental validation of coincidence summing corrections computed by the ETNA software.
    Lépy MC; Brun P; Collin C; Plagnard J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1340-5. PubMed ID: 16600602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for spectral interference corrections for direct measurements of 234U and 230Th in materials by gamma-ray spectrometry.
    Yücel H; Solmaz AN; Köse E; Bor D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):264-77. PubMed ID: 19843544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability of Type-I errors in the peak analyses of gamma-ray spectra.
    Korun M; Vodenik B; Zorko B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Feb; 72():58-63. PubMed ID: 23208232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interplay between the statistical correlations of gamma-ray emission probabilities and efficiency calibration.
    Castro RM; Vanin VR; Helene O; Pascholati PR; Maidana NL; Dias MS; Koskinas MF
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004; 60(2-4):185-90. PubMed ID: 14987640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of uncertainties in in situ and ex situ gamma measurements on land areas with low contamination levels.
    Rostron PD; Heathcote JA; Ramsey MH
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Jun; 35(2):391-9. PubMed ID: 25928900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculation of coincidence summing corrections for X-ray peaks and for sum peaks with X-ray contributions.
    Arnold D; Sima O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1297-302. PubMed ID: 16678431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical expressions for the computation of coincidence-summing correction factors in gamma-ray spectrometry with HPGe detectors.
    Rizzo S; Tomarchio E
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):555-60. PubMed ID: 19892555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedure for statistical analysis of one-parameter discrepant experimental data.
    Badikov SA; Chechev VP
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Sep; 70(9):1850-2. PubMed ID: 22459280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic influences on the areas of peaks in gamma-ray spectra that have a large statistical uncertainty.
    Bruggeman M; Collins SM; Done L; Đurašević M; Duch MA; Gudelis A; Hyža M; Jevremović A; Kandić A; Korun M; Ilie S; Lee JM; Lee KB; Luca A; Margineanu RM; Pantelica A; Serrano I; Šešlak B; Tugulan LC; Verheyen L; Vodenik B; Vukanac I; Zeng Z; Zorko B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Apr; 134():51-55. PubMed ID: 28673731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty in HPGe detector calibrations for in situ gamma-ray spectrometry.
    Boson J; Johansson L; Ramebäck H; Agren G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jun; 134(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 19429646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the probability of locating peaks using computerized peak-location methods in gamma-ray spectra as a function of the relative peak-area uncertainty.
    Ali Santoro MC; Anagnostakis MJ; Boshkova T; Camacho A; Iljadica MCF; Collins SM; Perez RD; Delgado JU; Đurašavić M; Duch MA; Elvira VH; Gomes RS; Gudelis A; Gurau D; Hurtado Bermudez S; Idoeta R; Jevremović A; Kandić A; Korun M; Karfopolous K; Laubenstein M; Long S; Margineanu RM; Mitsios I; Mulas D; Nikolić JK; Pantelica A; Medina VP; Pibida L; Potiriadis C; Silva RL; Siri S; Šešlak B; Verheyen L; Vodenik B; Vukanac I; Wiedner H; Zorko B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2020 Jan; 155():108920. PubMed ID: 31622844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disaggregating measurement uncertainty from population variability and Bayesian treatment of uncensored results.
    Strom DJ; Joyce KE; MacLellan JA; Watson DJ; Lynch TP; Antonio CL; Birchall A; Anderson KK; Zharov PA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(3):251-67. PubMed ID: 21693467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.