These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2247323)

  • 1. Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?
    Schneider B; Parker S
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Nov; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 2247323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: a study of individual differences.
    Gescheider GA; Hughson BA
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 1881765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics.
    Algom D; Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):706-27. PubMed ID: 2148587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in broadband noise.
    Schneider BA; Parker S
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 2300430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical bands and mixed-frequency scaling: sequential dependencies, equal-loudness contours, and power function exponents.
    Ward LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):551-62. PubMed ID: 2367175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The slippery context effect in psychophysics: intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua.
    Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Feb; 51(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 1549437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Slippery context effect and critical bands.
    Marks LE; Warner E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):986-96. PubMed ID: 1837309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cognitive influence on the loudness of tones that change continuously in level.
    Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):758-65. PubMed ID: 1506529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of pitch matching for pure tones and for complex tones with overlapping or nonoverlapping harmonics.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Proctor GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3443-50. PubMed ID: 1619120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnitude estimation and the "paradoxical" loudness of tinnitus.
    Penner MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 3762105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity resolution and loudness in high-pass noise.
    Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2171-9. PubMed ID: 8201113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time errors and differential sensation weighting.
    Hellström A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):460-77. PubMed ID: 528952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Recalibrating" the auditory system: the perception of loudness.
    Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):382-96. PubMed ID: 8189200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model of top-down gain control in the auditory system.
    Schneider BA; Parker S; Murphy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1562-78. PubMed ID: 21487927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli.
    Pastore RE; Flint J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: partial loudness.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):349-60. PubMed ID: 12880046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The stimulus range effect: evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition.
    Parker S; Schneider B
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jul; 56(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8084726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory and cognitive factors in judgments of loudness.
    Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):426-43. PubMed ID: 528950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling.
    Ward LM; Armstrong J; Golestani N
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):793-801. PubMed ID: 8710456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.