These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2247326)

  • 1. The effect of vibrato on the recognition of masked vowels.
    Demany L; Semal C
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Nov; 48(5):436-44. PubMed ID: 2247326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of envelope fluctuations in an apparent demonstration of suppression in simultaneous masking.
    Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3436-42. PubMed ID: 1619119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection thresholds for isolated vowels.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):820-9. PubMed ID: 2016431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal effects in simultaneous masking by vowel and consonant-vowel maskers.
    Bacon SP; Blake PE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 2314083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH; King CA; McLean-Mudgett KS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masking of filtered noise bursts by synthetic vowels.
    Resnick SB; Weiss MS; Heinz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Sep; 66(3):674-7. PubMed ID: 489839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysical suppression effects for tonal and speech signals.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2108-19. PubMed ID: 11681388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infants' detection and discrimination of sounds in modulated maskers.
    Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4156-67. PubMed ID: 23742367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width.
    Marin CM; McAdams S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):341-51. PubMed ID: 2002173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.
    Chatterjee M; Oba SI
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Dec; 5(4):360-75. PubMed ID: 15675001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous masking and unmasking with bandlimited noise.
    Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):899-905. PubMed ID: 6841816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Center frequency modulation detection for harmonic complexes resembling vowel formants and its interference by off-frequency maskers.
    Lyzenga J; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2792-806. PubMed ID: 10335631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase effects on the masking of speech by harmonic complexes: variations with level.
    Green T; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2876-83. PubMed ID: 24116424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of masker level on overshoot in running- and frozen-noise maskers.
    von Klitzing R; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2192-201. PubMed ID: 8201115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones.
    Schairer KS; Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1560-73. PubMed ID: 12656391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phase effects in masking: within- versus across-channel processes.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Wilkinson AJ; Jorasz U
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2158-66. PubMed ID: 14587613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.