These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22473276)

  • 1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 613-620).
    Drew PJ
    Br J Surg; 2012 May; 99(5):620. PubMed ID: 22473276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision.
    Ly J; Mittal A; Windsor J
    Br J Surg; 2012 May; 99(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 22367850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized double-blind trial comparing the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incisions.
    Aird LN; Bristol SG; Phang PT; Raval MJ; Brown CJ
    Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 25692789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cautery versus scalpel for abdominal skin incisions: a double blind, randomized crossover trial of scar cosmesis.
    Stupart DA; Sim FW; Chan ZH; Guest GD; Watters DA
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 24165306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scalpel versus diathermy skin incision in Caesarean section.
    AbdElaal NK; Ellakwa HE; Elhalaby AF; Shaheen AE; Aish AH
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 39(3):340-344. PubMed ID: 30634889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An invited commentary on "Diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (Int J Surg 2020; 75:35-43).
    Petroianu A
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():45-46. PubMed ID: 32105890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel skin incisions in uncomplicated appendectomy: A comparative study.
    Okereke CE; Katung AI; Adesunkanmi AK; Alatise OI
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2019; 26(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 31187749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invited commentary on "Diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis".
    Kemp MT; Alam HB
    Int J Surg; 2020 Jun; 78():58-59. PubMed ID: 32311517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scalpel Versus Diathermy in Wound Healing After Mucosal Incisions: A Split-Mouth Study.
    Wahab PUA; Madhulaxmi M; Senthilnathan P; Muthusekhar MR; Vohra Y; Abhinav RP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 76(6):1160-1164. PubMed ID: 29406253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised control trial of intraoperative and early outcome in scalpel versus monopolar diathermy for midline abdominal incisions.
    Igwe PO; Dodiyi-Manuel A; Wichendu PN
    S Afr J Surg; 2022 Sep; 60(3):167-170. PubMed ID: 36155370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of superficial surgical site infection following use of diathermy and scalpel for making skin incision in inguinal hernioplasty.
    Ali Q; Siddique K; Mirza S; Malik AZ
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 12(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 20329674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer.
    Kumar V; Tewari M; Shukla HS
    Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 21768669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diathermy or surgical scalpel for abdominal skin incisions: what is the impact on clinical practice?
    Longaker MT; Gurtner GC
    Ann Surg; 2011 Jan; 253(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 21294284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Scalpel versus Diathermy for Skin Incision in Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck Surgeries.
    Shrestha D
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Mar; 16(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 29717291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review and meta-analysis of electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical skin incisions.
    Aird LN; Brown CJ
    Am J Surg; 2012 Aug; 204(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 22537473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ligasure, Harmonic Scalpel versus conventional diathermy in excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Talha A; Bessa S; Abdel Wahab M
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):252-256. PubMed ID: 25214362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scalpel versus diathermy of midline skin incisions: comparison of mean pain scores on second post-operative day.
    Saeed S; Ali A; Zainab S; Junaid Khan MT
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2017 Oct; 67(10):1502-1505. PubMed ID: 28955064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.
    Kearns SR; Connolly EM; McNally S; McNamara DA; Deasy J
    Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 11136307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized bipolar diathermy with scissors and forceps in cutaneous surgery.
    Stenquist BC; Holt PJ; Motley RJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):601-2. PubMed ID: 12135515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomised trial of knife versus diathermy in pilonidal disease.
    Duxbury MS; Blake SM; Dashfield A; Lambert AW
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Nov; 85(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 14629883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.