985 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22473564)
21. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy.
Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Hülsmann M; Schade M; Schäfers F
Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):538-46. PubMed ID: 11601772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Apical transportation associated with ProTaper Universal F1, F2 and F3 instruments in curved canals prepared by undergraduate students.
Brito-Júnior M; Faria-E-Silva AL; Camilo CC; Pereira RD; Braga NM; Sousa-Neto MD
J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Apr; 22(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 24676579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative analysis of curved root canal preparation using nickel-titanium instruments with or without EDTA.
Bramante CM; Betti LV
J Endod; 2000 May; 26(5):278-80. PubMed ID: 11199735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals.
Pasqualini D; Bianchi CC; Paolino DS; Mancini L; Cemenasco A; Cantatore G; Castellucci A; Berutti E
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 22341081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Ganahl D; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19567334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography.
Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Hülsmann M; Gressmann G; Schäfers F
Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):358-66. PubMed ID: 12752650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
