985 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22473564)
41. Scouting Ability of 4 Pathfinding Instruments in Moderately Curved Molar Canals.
De-Deus G; Belladonna FG; Souza EM; Alves Vde O; Silva EJ; Rodrigues E; Versiani MA; Bueno CE
J Endod; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1540-4. PubMed ID: 27663618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers.
Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Dinçol ME; Dağlaroğlu R
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):756-62. PubMed ID: 22432937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ex vivo analysis of the debris remaining in flattened root canals of vital and nonvital teeth after biomechanical preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
Sasaki EW; Versiani MA; Perez DE; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva-Sousa YT; Silva RG
Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 17262131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effectiveness of a self-adjusting file to remove residual gutta-percha after retreatment with rotary files.
Abramovitz I; Relles-Bonar S; Baransi B; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 Apr; 45(4):386-92. PubMed ID: 22283664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system.
Liu R; Hou BX; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1054-6. PubMed ID: 23880276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study.
Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study.
Schäfer E; Schulz-Bongert U; Tulus G
J Endod; 2004 Jun; 30(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 15167474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
Liu W; Wu B
J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems.
Versiani MA; Leoni GB; Steier L; De-Deus G; Tassani S; Pécora JD; de Sousa-Neto MD
J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23880278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study.
Paqué F; Balmer M; Attin T; Peters OA
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 20307747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 19410086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
